From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: core-updates, next release, and all that Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 01:10:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87h9bavfrw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zip9pex1.fsf@gnu.org> <20160722215936.GA6082@jasmine> <87h9bgocyk.fsf@gnu.org> <20160723112242.GA5942@solar> <20160724165922.GA4696@jasmine> <20160724174409.GA10837@solar> <87bn1lcp4d.fsf@gnu.org> <20160726213659.GA15537@solar> <20160727104436.GA2123@solar> <20160727162712.GA5456@solar> <20160727182851.GA6247@solar> <87wpk6vinx.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58910) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSXyI-000228-0p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 19:10:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bSXyC-0008AL-54 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jul 2016 19:10:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87wpk6vinx.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:08:02 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > Andreas Enge skribis: > >> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 06:27:12PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote: >>> Indeed. After disabling this one test, the package builds on my mips ma= chine. >>> I pushed and will start a new evaluation of core-updates. >> >> Drawback: This essentially recompiles all of core-updates. > > Not OK. > >> If we consider mips64el as a "release critical" architecture in Debian >> parlance, I would say we have no choice. Otherwise, we could also >> revert my commit and merge core-updates now. > > What about reverting, and instead modifying in a mips64el conditional? > As in: > > (arguments > `(#:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases > ,@(if (string-prefix? "mips64el" (%current-system)) > '((add-before 'check 'disable-the-thing =E2=80=A6)) > '()) > =E2=80=A6))) I pushed something along these lines as 8b732bf6d93ad2cb529c3c5f886efe2625c5fb72, and also canceled the previous evaluation builds and started a new evaluation. Hopefully that will allow us to merge core-updates more quickly! Ludo=E2=80=99.