From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: guix bootloader selection - wip patch
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 11:49:06 +0200
Message-ID: <87h9b3zejx.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20160721223501.3a989d55@scratchpost.org> <877fc815wg.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160727113248.2ee9087c@scratchpost.org>
	<20160727222924.07209026@scratchpost.org> <874m7aj601.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160729102155.26d0083d@scratchpost.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48560)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bUWKH-0008Um-UO
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 05:49:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1bUWKE-0007ZJ-1Q
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Aug 2016 05:49:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20160729102155.26d0083d@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's
	message of "Fri, 29 Jul 2016 10:21:55 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> skribis:

>> Really, installing U-Boot is as simple as this?  If it is, that=E2=80=99s
>> perfect.  :-)
>
> Nope, it's just a placeholder :)
>
> But ideally U-Boot would provide something like that.
>
> I'm looking into writing u-boot-install.c and maybe contributing it to U-=
Boot - let's see how bad it is.

I think we should adapt to whatever U-Boot provides for installation.
(I installed it years ago on a plug computer but forgot all the
details.)

>> I see three separate things here:
>>=20
>>   1. Replacing =E2=80=9Cgrub=E2=80=9D by =E2=80=9Cbootloader=E2=80=9D in=
 the API (cosmetic change);
>>=20
>>   2. Adding the build-side code to install U-Boot;
>>=20
>>   3. Adding the host-side code to handle <u-boot-configuration> and do
>>      the right thing.
>>=20
>> To facilitate review, could you separate these three things?
>
> As far as they are in different files, yes.

Not everything is in separate files I think, but =E2=80=98git rebase -i=E2=
=80=99 or
similar should facilitate the operation.

> Which part is the build-side, which part is the host-side?

The =E2=80=9Cbuild side=E2=80=9D is the (gnu build =E2=80=A6) and (guix bui=
ld =E2=80=A6) modules: they
contain code that is executed as part of build processes, or at run
time.

The =E2=80=9Chost side=E2=80=9D is the rest, which contains package declara=
tions, OS
declarations, service declarations, and code that drives the compilation
of all that.

(See =E2=80=9CG-Expressions=E2=80=9D in the manual for a discussion of this=
.)

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.