From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: gnunet: Add inputs. Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 16:00:19 +0000 Message-ID: <87h99bg9rg.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> References: <20160916134921.17987-1-ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <8737kwm2y5.fsf@elephly.net> <87zin42c94.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87wpi8kkvf.fsf@elephly.net> <874m5bzzoy.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87vaxrlxuo.fsf@elephly.net> <57E00586.7020001@goebel-consult.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54967) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bm105-0003W1-SJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:01:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bm0zz-0000OA-Tr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:00:56 -0400 Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:39513) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bm0zz-0000MH-My for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:00:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: <57E00586.7020001@goebel-consult.de> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Hartmut Goebel , guix-devel@gnu.org Hartmut Goebel writes: > [ Unknown signature status ] > Am 19.09.2016 um 17:21 schrieb Ricardo Wurmus: >> Ah, thanks. This makes sense. I wonder if it were possible to split >> the applications. Not now but in the future. Would be nice to be able >> install these things separately. > > I'm afraid this would require larger changes to gnunet - which I do not > expect to happen anytime soon. They even added an option `--with-taler` > (AFAIR) to compile only the parts relevant for the taler payment. This > sound like gnunet being a huge pile of software which is hard to split. :-( I don't know about taler-payment. I just package merchant and that other part which requires building, the rest does not need packaging. About a huge piece of software, I don't see this. I see modules, and at the rootlevel svn it has many individual pieces, one of them being gnunet. I have no access to the roadmap, but I can ask for a further splitup / makefile options to be added. Makefiles are not so much my domain and I wiuld like to add this, but I focus on other things. -- ng0