From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add femtolisp.
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 21:30:31 +0200
Message-ID: <87h99982zs.fsf@elephly.net>
References: <87mvjbegxs.fsf@elephly.net> <87oa3rmtg8.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87d1k6etze.fsf@elephly.net> <874m5i3k0h.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87y42u24nc.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87a8faer2a.fsf@elephly.net>
	<871t0miy7t.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <877faeeo7m.fsf@elephly.net>
	<87sht2afyr.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87h99ieljb.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<20160918100239.GA4752@solar> <87fuovp06b.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87zin1pmhm.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87oa3hi7xs.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52627)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1bmnEE-0002Ik-OV
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:30:47 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rekado@elephly.net>) id 1bmnED-0001bq-UR
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 15:30:46 -0400
In-reply-to: <87oa3hi7xs.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org


Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> ng0 <ngillmann@runbox.com> skribis:
[…]
>> Okay, I will fix it. In the meantime should the additional patch which
>> is unrelated to this change be applied.
>
> Sorry, I’ll let whoever reviewed reply.  :-)

That would be me :)

I pushed the patch to remove the custom build phase.  It’s in master as
f7fe5f7a3e26676657265e98073b9914baf615f1.

~~ Ricardo