From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: bug#18742: bug #18742 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 14:52:42 +0000 Message-ID: <87h98xv3r9.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> References: <87y42djo2c.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <20160927175823.GF2569@jasmine> <877f9xjj9l.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50281) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpzCQ-000320-EM for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:54:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpzCM-0000ZT-79 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:54:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bpzCM-0000ZD-3B for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:54:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bpzCL-0003ci-S4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:54:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <877f9xjj9l.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: 18742@debbugs.gnu.org Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org ng0 writes: > Leo Famulari writes: > > > However you are replying to these bug reports is changing the "Subject" > > line to only include the bug number. It's hard to know what the bug is > > about... > > I did not want to reply directly to these specific bugs, which is why I > asked on this list first. > > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 04:38:03PM +0000, ng0 wrote: > > > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=18742 > > > > > > Logs are gone since hydra got reset at least once since October 2014. I > > [ 2 more citation lines. Click/Enter to show. ] > > > can not see but only assume that the tests I am currently helping to fix > > > are different tests than the ones which failed in 2014, as the test > > > suite for GNUnet was refactored. > > > Can we close this bug or should I reference this bug in an update commit > > > if/when the test suite is fixed for Guix builds? > > > It seems to be building or not building (depending on the architecture) > > consistently. If you are happy with those results, please close the bug > > :) > > I think I can not do this, close bugs I did not create myself. If I am > wrong about this I advise that we write a short appendum for Guix > documentation (part: contributing, new subsection: reporting bugs) which > explains debbugs usage, because upstream or at least the version+online > handbook on gnu.org is simply terrible in getting to the point. > > > > https://hydra.gnu.org/search?query=gnunet > > Dependencies fail on architecture I do not have available (yet / in a > forseeable future). Related to this: what are affordable, powerful (should at least be able to bootstrap any X11 based system) hardware systems for arm and mips where people build Guix on? > I think I'm okay with referencing this bug when/if I can close the > current failing test suite bug. > -- > ng0 > > --