From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add denemo. Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 07:32:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87h969d5d3.fsf@elephly.net> References: <87r35ikzjw.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87eg1g7p8n.fsf@gnu.org> <87twaciipd.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87h96asukd.fsf@elephly.net> <8737hu5bfg.fsf@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35581) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGKfi-0004H3-D1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 02:05:15 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cGKfh-0002TO-Fy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Dec 2016 02:05:14 -0500 In-reply-to: <8737hu5bfg.fsf@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Kei Kebreau writes: > Ricardo Wurmus writes: > >> Kei Kebreau writes: >> >>> Indeed it is not. I've removed these inputs from the new patch. As a >>> side note, lilypond was required as a runtime dependency so I moved it >>> to propagated-inputs. >> >> Do you think it would be possible to patch the sources to refer to the >> Lilypond executable instead of propagating the input? > > Good idea! Does this patch look good to you? Yes, thank you! -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC http://elephly.net