From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Subject: Unrar package might contain proprietary code. Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 20:59:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87h93cn4ye.fsf@lassieur.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39236) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAPa-0007Vc-2b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:59:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cjAPV-0007tj-LW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:59:46 -0500 List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Cc: John Darrington I had a look at the source of the recently commited "unrar" package, and I could not find neither "copyright" lines nor pointers to the full notice, except in unrarlib.h and unrarlib.c, which belong to a different project. IANAL, but according to GPLv2 and https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.en.html, those things are mandatory, COPYING is not enough. So I think the "unrar" package contains proprietary code.