From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Introducing =?utf-8?B?4oCYZ3VpeCBwYWNr4oCZ?=
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 23:28:05 +0100
Message-ID: <87h92suaa2.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87d1dodcnb.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60828)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1codsR-0002TB-To
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 18:28:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1codsO-00042r-Gy
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 18:28:11 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87d1dodcnb.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 10 Mar 2017 22:50:48 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Hello Guix!  Hello 2.2 Guilers!

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis:

> I=E2=80=99d like to move support for Docker (currently in =E2=80=98guix a=
rchive=E2=80=99) to
> this new command because I think it=E2=80=99s more appropriate: =E2=80=98=
guix archive=E2=80=99
> is supposed to be rather low-level so it would not create a profile, for
> instance.

As of right now, =E2=80=98guix pack=E2=80=99 can create Docker image (=E2=
=80=98guix archive=E2=80=99
can no longer do that):

  guix pack guile-next -S /opt/guile-2.2.0=3D -f docker

I=E2=80=99d be grateful if someone could check with Docker that I didn=E2=
=80=99t break
anything though.  Any takers?  :-)

The archive build process is bit-reproducible too, which is pretty cool
(Docker images created in January, 1970!).

That=E2=80=99s it!

Ludo=E2=80=99.