From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Greenisland & SDDM
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 00:12:12 +0200
Message-ID: <87h9268nnn.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87mvdpw3b3.fsf@gnu.org> <20170320184145.GA5087@jasmine>
	<87a884td23.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<87k273g3qz.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87tw66j0oe.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	<87lgri8q1s.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
	<874ly6wl68.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33954)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cunjP-0003XW-S1
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 18:12:20 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1cunjM-0003PP-Mt
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Apr 2017 18:12:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: <874ly6wl68.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
	(Marius Bakke's message of "Sun, 02 Apr 2017 23:31:59 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Since, SDDM can be built without Greenisland (and thus without Wayland
>> support I suppose), what about doing just that?
>
> I suggested this in [0] and see now that I completely missed Leos reply.
>
> Let's do that. No blockers left from my side, at least.
>
> [0] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D26200

Perfect, thanks!

Ludo=E2=80=99.