From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#26441: =?UTF-8?Q?Gnulib=E2=80=99s_?=
	=?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=98test-lock=E2=80=99?= fails to complete on
	machines with >= 32 cores
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 18:11:22 +0200
Message-ID: <87h91td2s5.fsf__42256.174182012$1492013541$gmane$org@gnu.org>
References: <871sszuznt.fsf@gnu.org> <86shleatk3.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87wpapdedp.fsf@gnu.org> <2008088.TpEHzIiNi8@omega>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46508)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cyKsI-0003iS-VG
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:12:11 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cyKsE-0005hK-6s
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:12:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46417)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1cyKsE-0005hG-3u
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:12:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1cyKsD-0005iD-VR
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:12:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.26441.B26441.149201350221929@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <2008088.TpEHzIiNi8@omega> (Bruno Haible's message of "Wed, 12
	Apr 2017 16:37:03 +0200")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org>
Cc: bug-gnulib@gnu.org, 26441@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Bruno,

Bruno Haible <bruno@clisp.org> skribis:

>> The =E2=80=98test-lock=E2=80=99 test as shipped with gettext-0.19.8.1 fa=
ils to complete
>> (or hangs?) on machines with 32+ cores, as reported here:
>>=20
>>   https://bugs.gnu.org/26441
>>=20
>> Does that ring a bell?
>
> Yes, this is the bug that was investigated in December 2016 [1] and
> subsequently fixed [2].
>
>> Mathieu Othacehe found that this is fixed by gettext commit
>> 1afbcb06fded2a427b761dd1615b1e48e1e853cc but writes:
>>=20
>> > However, I don't fully understand the difference between commit
>> > 1afbcb06fded2a427b761dd1615b1e48e1e853cc in gettext and commit
>> > 480d374e596a0ee3fed168ab42cd84c313ad3c89 in gnulib.
>
> gettext contains two copies of test-lock.c, one from gnulib and
> a another one that doesn't use gnulib.
> The commit 480d374e596a0ee3fed168ab42cd84c313ad3c89 in gnulib fixed
> the first one.
> The commit 1afbcb06fded2a427b761dd1615b1e48e1e853cc in gettext fixed
> the second one, in the same way.

OK, thanks for the explanation.  I guess we=E2=80=99ll borrow the relevant
patches.

Ludo=E2=80=99.