From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: User-Friendlyness of Guix and non-scaryness, printing messages
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2017 23:41:46 +0200
Message-ID: <87h8zz75d1.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87bbe3e5.AEAAKL2r-KIAAAAAAAAAAAOtUOAAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZGcQo@mailjet.com>
	<87y3tw4kw3.fsf@gnu.org>
	<fcac084e.AEEAKxWCyNIAAAAAAAAAAAOzWv8AAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZH1iD@mailjet.com>
	<87r2zfx0xt.fsf@gnu.org>
	<427678e8.AEUAKjfDcSgAAAAAAAAAAAPB0agAAAACwQwAAAAAAAW9WABZKceD@mailjet.com>
	<20170528204437.6dfd35c4@scratchpost.org>
	<20170528192058.GF15883@jasmine>
	<20170528214029.58dafacf@scratchpost.org> <878tlgn0s3.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20170601002629.304d95c0@scratchpost.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37681)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1dGXqs-0008IB-AY
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 17:41:55 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1dGXqo-00076H-0G
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 17:41:54 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20170601002629.304d95c0@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's
	message of "Thu, 1 Jun 2017 00:26:29 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> skribis:

> On Sun, 28 May 2017 23:12:44 +0200
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>=20
>> Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org> skribis:
>>=20
>> >> Perhaps for `guix package`, but I disagree for `guix build` and other=
s.
>> >> It prints *only* the new store items on stdout, and this makes it very
>> >> easy to compose Guix commands. We should not break this.=20=20
>> >
>> > I agree. guix build is different.  Its whole point is to do that.
>> >
>> > The scripts I mean are:
>> > - guix package
>> > - guix system=20=20
>>=20
>> Agreed for these.
>
> I forgot guix environment.
>
>> I=E2=80=99ve just pushed an old experiment as =E2=80=98wip-ui=E2=80=99 t=
o give an idea of what I
>> mean.  If it still works, =E2=80=98guix package=E2=80=99 shows N line ab=
out the ongoing
>
> I'll check it out...
>
>> progress, where N is the number of parallel jobs (--max-jobs).  It could
>> be as concise as this:
>> <http://nim-lang.org/news/e029_version_0_16_0.html>.
>
> Hmm, is that the correct URL ? :)

It was correct once upon a time.  :-)  Here=E2=80=99s the current one:
<https://nim-lang.org/blog/2017/01/08/version-0160-released.html>.

Ludo=E2=80=99.