From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
Subject: bug#27152: deprecation warnings with Guile 2.2.2
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2017 21:43:05 -0700
Message-ID: <87h8zxr89y.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87wp8y2ijw.fsf@elephly.net> <87h90091y4.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAN-vT6T8_ajiXi0crfywO7sM8Wqj6+GmhgH3rYVn8-PT0BfBMA@mail.gmail.com>
	<871sr1yiik.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45885)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dH0v0-0007Gs-CV
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 00:44:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dH0uw-0002fW-C7
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 00:44:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49606)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dH0uw-0002ex-88
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 00:44:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dH0uv-0007wC-RA
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 00:44:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.27152.B27152.149646499730447@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <871sr1yiik.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Fri, 02
	Jun 2017 21:20:03 -0400")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: 27152@debbugs.gnu.org

Hi Mark,

Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:

> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wro=
te:
>>
>>  Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:
>>
>>  > I get a couple of deprecation warnings with Guile 2.2.2, for example
>>  >
>>  > Import (ice-9 threads) to have access to `current-processor-count'.
>>  > `_IOFBF' is deprecated. Use the symbol 'block instead.
>>
>>  We can fix the first one with #:use-module (ice-9 threads).
>>
>>  The second one is just a pain: in 2.2 one is supposed to write
>>
>>  (setvbuf port 'block)
>>
>>  instead of
>>
>>  (setvbuf port _IOFBF)
>>
>>  So we could do:
>>
>>  (cond-expand (guile-2.2 (define _IOFBF 'block))
>>  (else #t))
>>
>>  in some central place (that doesn=E2=80=99t exist), but really, that=E2=
=80=99s annoying.
>>
>>  So I=E2=80=99m tempted to do nothing.
>>
>>  Note that normally users do not see these deprecation warnings at all.
>>
>>  Thoughts?
>>
>> Why not let good old sed have a run at it? Seems like a simple find and =
replace operation, and 'block looks nicer than _IOFBF to my eyes.
>
> If we did that, then Guix would stop working with guile-2.0.  Given that
> guile-2.2 is not yet available from many popular distros, I think it
> would be unwise to drop guile-2.0 at this time.

Isn't Guile included in the Guix binary releases? I would have thought
so. Otherwise, I just tried "guix pack guile@2.2" and the resulting
archive is 40 MiB.

I'm not saying it's worth it, but it's an option.

Maxim