From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47210) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUiTF-0005PZ-HS for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:52:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUiTC-0006fb-Fn for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:52:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUiTC-0006fO-CP for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:52:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dUiTC-0001lp-0g for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:52:02 -0400 Subject: bug#27568: Bigloo update Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: From: Kei Kebreau References: <87zicl71oe.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87o9t16s4f.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87efto7g5f.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 19:51:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87efto7g5f.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:14:20 +0200") Message-ID: <87h8yjrguf.fsf@openmailbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27568-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Hello gentlefolks, > > Kei Kebreau skribis: > >> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice writes: >> >>> Kei, >>> >>> On 03/07/17 21:36, Kei Kebreau wrote: >>>> These two packages should be updated at the same time, as the old hop >>>> won't build with the new bigloo. >>>>=20 >>>> I'd feel better if a bigloo and hop user verified that everything still >>>> works as it should. >>> >>> I'm afraid I can't help you with that, but I can always ask annoying >>> questions: why the update to a release candidate? >>> >> >> Mainly because the existing (stable?) hop wasn't building correctly and >> had mysteriously absent make targets. >> >>> The web site[1] left me more confused than I entered. The =E2=80=98file= you >>> should download if you want to build the Hop stable [sic] version from >>> the sources=E2=80=99 is the even less stable-looking hop-3.1.0-pre1.tar= .gz... >>> >> >> The same thing happened to me! I noticed that hop version 3.1.x only >> existed in the developer's git repository on GitHub[2], so I just got >> the latest available source tarball from the FTP server. > > Hop 3.x has been in the works for a couple of years but I think they > never put out a proper release. > > So I think it=E2=80=99s OK to upgrade to this =E2=80=9CRC=E2=80=9D. (Eve= n though I preferred > 2.5 since 3.x is actually a JavaScript implementation=E2=80=A6) > > As for testing, I=E2=80=99d say that if the tests pass, that=E2=80=99s OK. > > Thank you! > > Ludo=E2=80=99. Thanks to both of you for the review. Changes pushed as 5e3ea571c5ac10858b2a1d6d3dc94a26408ae601 and 082725b5027a3782f242b634f94b9049d4c7f309! P.S. The most recent Hop version is 3.1.0-pre2 as of today and the older RC was removed from the FTP server. I updated the package definition accordingly. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAllkEvgACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg2W6g//YUa16sYB4FQ5wJOzeeQqfX7JcxwJwaKg3t37PubVsDI2TWtxvLFhrH6N 2q/Y5OMyKDq4lTa3jYyvjM1C7VKBCpS5a4/Bmv2aP0s2tOdsIhfvsswpPEDc+kpd Dx+AYmpjhFiX15uHu8V0Y0oiLpIcR0RkDALt/rTrOBTwg1GfG6jdzypIDy7K3Bzt ZQo+tZ5vdVFY9c8cO9Fa7T7KMYsd/Yw4+KkKcobb6ZfQkD24ycNHVsbqKYg6NEQz h/Rp932k912/3hrTgOX8zQWtY9ugOvBFFG72gjGOqj/nm5xvbb7+c3/sX3fcuOGV Waa44GI8DR3fJOvEue48V5dsHlgsK8rpKdigvW/74JqChojl6nexi7WRyzGwlSfa bHkTALjzTQgs/ceHYDPHi/ClcM/VqWS82JtyQ5MyoPyw4/MoN0EFlIZiF7V2Qv4Y 9GTYs7+qZ/LS3QxXS2kcfbFoUj9dwkSE1p/ftyswQpGMZpUIKHQBinlFkfCQIv4K BHRy3PRGfxc0fsIvyGzJjGiOgBCGH0JmQyuONi+kKUGhkfNHnJBYNCgmUuxNk/St k2qEhUhmj+FUflV5PLbTgduyv5TmRcjPbREfPJjG0HE4TbEhXTNirnlJsEAyVQIq LHUnZqfK/MRmlH0iH6K5gL31L3M79SsO7kZwX0T/A2fdcuV0Ga8= =V+/E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--