From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47347) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkTX1-0003uL-9i for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:09:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkTWw-0003il-BC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:09:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41766) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dkTWw-0003iY-8T for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:09:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dkTWv-0003z7-R3 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Aug 2017 07:09:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#27850] gnu: mpi: openmpi: Don't enable thread-multiple Resent-Message-ID: From: Dave Love References: <87wp6thqjc.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk> <87379c4oxs.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9s0bhro.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk> <87lgn3skmm.fsf@inria.fr> <87tw1r9sss.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk> <87bmnzxk50.fsf@inria.fr> <874ltr9hhs.fsf@i-ulialbion.it.manchester.ac.uk> <87o9r9t5yy.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2017 12:08:32 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87o9r9t5yy.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?Court\=E8s\?\= \=\?iso-8859-1\?Q\?\=22's\?\= message of "Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:17:57 +0200") Message-ID: <87h8wyh77z.fsf@albion.it.manchester.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 27850-done@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hello Dave, > > Sorry for the looong delay! I'm sure you deserve holidays. > I went ahead and applied the patch you posted, minus the extra outputs, What's the problem with a runtime output? I think it's a problem if running MPI programs requires a development environment on compute nodes. > and without =E2=80=98string-append=E2=80=99 in the description (which pre= vents l10n). OK. I'll post a general question about that. I'm happy to support localization (or even localisation for misguided people ). >>> What do you have in mind for SLURM? >> >> There's integration with SLURM (--with-slurm), PBS/Torque, and LSF (or, >> I guess, Open Lava in the free world). I don't know much about them, >> but they build MCA modules. Unlike the gridengine support, they link >> against libraries for the resource managers, so you want them to be >> add-ons which are only installed when required (not like the Fedora >> packaging). > > I see. I suppose we could make them separate outputs to avoid the > overhead, if that=E2=80=99s justified? Yes, I think so. It's probably best if someone does it who uses those resource managers and can test the result.