From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34573) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaqgD-00031M-QK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:23:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaqgA-0000DM-Ih for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:23:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48523) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaqgA-0000DD-Ff for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:23:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eaqgA-0002xw-6j for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:23:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#28773] [PATCH] Wrap bin files in the ruby build system. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20171010084452.036b3052@cbaines.net> <877evvdycy.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1wom5j9.fsf@gnu.org> From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: <87k1wom5j9.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 22:22:15 +0000 Message-ID: <87h8rot71k.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 28773@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hello! > > Ben Woodcroft skribis: > >> On 16/10/17 23:19, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>> Hi Chris, >>> >>> Christopher Baines skribis: >>> >>>> This is a bit experimental. There is some description of the motivation >>>> behind this approach, as well as the downsides in the commit messages. >>>> >>>> I don't know how to wrap binaries with the GEM_PATH, but somehow >>>> excluding inputs specified as native-inputs, so I'd be very interested >>>> if anyone has ideas about this. >>>> >>>> Christopher Baines (3): >>>> ruby-build-system: Add wrap-ruby-program. >>>> ruby-build-system: Add a new wrap phase. >>>> gnu: Remove redundant wrapping from packages using ruby-build-syste= m. >>> Cc=E2=80=99ing Ben who is another Serious Ruby User I think. :-) >> >> Maybe sometimes. I'll try to get a review back to you in the next week >> or so. > > Ahem. :-) > > Chris, if you=E2=80=99re confident, I=E2=80=99d say you can go ahead. It= does sound > like an improvement so it=E2=80=99d be sad to lose it. Great, I've now pushed this, along with the other ruby build system change. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAlpb2BdfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9XfNVg//Sk6nw5J+rAEq4Z2mPg2MF/1FrrXp+Jzk2/yRjPvO/FdQCI5ly6Qi+azN G4f+yV/uQtEpZj1XpREBwpOvIAln8GcWmr/X+G6mQPj0rymlEaFazH6H+7q22neC ot/8q/PAkcRLtx8qaDn/IV2681Vo6wSEqgw68V2+VXt2hDJBQMkEwSZDx/jKfx0f AYXfIHaoa3qiFO6xaGPZYnlyAFLBGqxgOFTelJIcXK+sn2E5fWkePuKAkPzPDedZ jYafB6SZDBv/HqWGWKk+qIHNJvCCxQ7UW+Z7GwDfPX71vBZ7o3nLan17fskI4J1b /8wZuLoE8W3VOYsRQl9DD8661GNiEipG8Ikulsfpq8bl9/6wC0ZNVEprofXZFT2f RjevR5JdhXtOeglrK8ylQxKlMSwpr4y5mIl3flpotHPvh4sA1E0qnhLzspGO99J3 nHgBbYhJOjN9Y9qi5WUap+y1oE8OGfJDfKe2+AeJRUtHQSicEZEiBIljy4y18qK3 QeLCZjnLftN32mqgmIvlPyTjV7LaKWFKNuqOMCqLqGjuIxo87jK8LLLmvcBa0ebr i9E9ZE0VJ8mddiHmICSpDvypgmASNQwDsTLfA8LqKIUNGTO6L8+cRr5pdyLuhIgW 7Rz26lkG8WTv0qqD+0lUb3f91qC3NvKzcB9RJCHMoI1wVHPnWts= =g7of -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--