From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epAvX-0008Hr-Rh for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 05:50:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epAvS-0003gW-QE for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 05:50:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1epAvS-0003gG-Ky for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 05:50:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1epAvS-0003pL-8x for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 05:50:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30274] [PATCH 00/21] gnu: Add licensecheck (license checker for source files). Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <87o9kgkchr.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20180128184437.32296-1-go.wigust@gmail.com> <87a7wxrdop.fsf@gmail.com> <87vaep9kg0.fsf@fastmail.com> <87o9kgkchr.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:49:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87h8q89e15.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Oleg Pykhalov Cc: 30274@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Oleg Pykhalov writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> Oleg Pykhalov writes: >> >>> The following are new to me, so should I add a "v" in (version =E2=80= =A6) for >>> those packages? I see for example perl-file-find-object has it. >>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >>> /home/natsu/src/guix-wip-licensecheck/gnu/packages/license.scm:108:2: l= icensecheck@3.0.31: can be upgraded to v3.0.31 >>> /home/natsu/src/guix-wip-licensecheck/gnu/packages/license.scm:33:2: pe= rl-regexp-pattern-license@3.0.31: can be upgraded to v3.0.31 >>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> This is a bug in the CPAN updater. We strip the 'v' prefix from package >> versions, which confuses the updater when upstream uses a 'v' prefix in >> the metadata. >> >> It would be nice to make it ignore that :-) > > Sorry, not clear to me. Should I add a "v" prefix to the version field? Sorry, I meant the opposite: we don't add the "v" prefix. It would be nice to make the CPAN updater aware of that. > I see a bunch of packages packages have "v" prefix: > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > ./gnu/packages/perl.scm:3599: (version "v2.49.1") > ./gnu/packages/perl.scm:7969: (version "v0.0.2") > ./gnu/packages/perl.scm:8697: (version "v0.2.13") > ./gnu/packages/networking.scm:778: (version "v0.003") > ./gnu/packages/mail.scm:1755: (version "v2.9.0") > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Let's fix these :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlqP8bYACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPonbAf+K33mKBV0xeBreBrKxoX98UqSq/DdwznPo7zt+wYc2M7c/HHVKY3IiCpf z0tmPVE8+a43Be81KwKN6uOBwPQ08Fla/B/hYL31GYwp4LcYRYHchicG8RF2MIlT jIP1NcWHuglBNeZqiwrnTWI4+wYOPzJUn87N12ZlXZ8qv3Ifq4iMwbN3gtglftWP L4oZSYvLMAb692iCArBmi4kcSsCnBePckcAF/RHPEGbGMS+zNKVWq7gYKwX868mD +n98LzJ49DeoA0gmqM4OCVeEWL5lOERYT9gcxRKbSqHWGQN2bvn0QOEJ5t2Ku8ZD znS56nWn1GVEFCpHZ34GDv9J6PUqcQ== =WPLj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--