From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41833) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewtQc-0004n0-44 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:46:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewtQY-0004MG-Vd for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:46:06 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:57595) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ewtQY-0004M8-OI for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:46:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ewtQY-0003ve-EY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:46:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#28004] Chromium Resent-Message-ID: From: Marius Bakke In-Reply-To: <20180316173044.dctlydfij7smndxd@abyayala> References: <20180108232042.nqjurjr2bcfl2yyc@abyayala> <87373cey5b.fsf@fastmail.com> <87vag16g5z.fsf@gnu.org> <87fu75aar5.fsf@fastmail.com> <874lnkr0vf.fsf@gnu.org> <87vaejvclc.fsf@fastmail.com> <20180226200133.zsnahblbgzovrtmu@abyayala> <87muzvv7ku.fsf@fastmail.com> <20180226234144.032af030@alma-ubu> <87woyxt3nz.fsf@fastmail.com> <20180316173044.dctlydfij7smndxd@abyayala> Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2018 18:45:04 +0100 Message-ID: <87h8pfc3tr.fsf@fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: ng0 Cc: 28004@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain ng0 writes: > I think we found it to be good enough to be included in master, or did I miss anything? > > Would be nice if I could drop my local patch (and building). The team around Taler seems > to be interested in it as well as far as I can remember our chats in Leipzig. Reading up on GNU Taler, Chromium seems like a poor choice for an anonymous payment system. Why not GNU IceCat? I don't see Chromium becoming stable enough for guaranteed privacy any time soon. And a full fork would require a large maintenance team. Unfortunately I got busy after the latest update, and haven't had time to work on 65 yet. I will send an update once I get around to it, and also try some other Inox patches and see if they help with the "first launch" issue -- hopefully within a week or two. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlqsAqAACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpoYgf+ILajYD73EBu0xTFNQGJn2XIbTesjwIgVWEIKWdlLswDaoP+eD0WnrBsu 5o/GrYeWMwKpxJ7mc7PLYCuYB8zpgLQB4C/heNKNpljS2BHVevaHE8DHpNam5dIr fT001k7JHhZuXQQWauNfgmUBXP/oGp5+KyH+Co9zbXpX7OlegwNbc6DZwq+rRUG2 gmxgKxRKLDM51pAGQySV6eoBhGG1GJYxNdTeUdcEXoJtX0cBVcta9iswA2YQFMKL vNXZPfgGsOv75KIFEzhdV5BYw3x7uQBYtvkcu6G9OkCeNbk6HJNYpfapM0WqBZhs ymG1kcpiTDUD/e4uBDd80OrQnHhggQ== =0xjP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--