Hi, I'm currently working on Cuirass, so that it looks a bit more like Hydra. The changes include: 1. Adding support for multiple inputs. Currently Cuirass only supports one input per specification, which has to be the Guix git repository. But one might want inputs for: - a repository containing the 'proc' that returns the jobs, - a repository containing extra packages (GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH). Those inputs would be fetched at INTERVAL as well, and any change would trigger an evaluation. This is a follow-up of https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2018-06/msg00311.html. 2. Removing the notion of 'project'. Cuirass really has no project, and what is called a 'project' is in fact a 'specification' (which Hydra calls 'jobset'). And what is called a 'jobset' by Cuirass is in fact the branch of the Guix input. So the patch associates to the name 'jobset' what it really is: a specification. A consequence is that the 'jobset' filtering of the API now filters by specification name, and it is not possible anymore to filter by branch. (But it was useless IMHO.) 3. Allowing any input to be in Guile's %load-path when 'proc' is called. Usually, the only input that is in Guile's %load-path is Guix. But someone might want to use a custom library in 'proc'. The alternative is to just specify the Guix input that should be appended to Guile's %load-path. (I'm unsure about 3., I can't find any real use case. That would just make it more flexible I guess.) Also, some specification fields (#:load-path-inputs, #:package-path-inputs, #:proc-input) refer to the inputs by their name, as Hydra does (with nixExprInput). This makes it easy to do configuration mistakes, and would ultimately require a configuration syntax checker. The only alternative I can think of involves duplicating the inputs, which isn't good. I'm sending this email because even though the patches are already done and they work on my Cuirass instance, there are a few other things to do before I can send them: - add a mechanism to update the database, - update the documentation. So if you think I'm not on the right track, please let me know as soon as possible :-) I attached my configuration before those patches and the one after them, so that you can see how the new configuration would look like. The work in progress is available at https://git.lassieur.org/cgit/cuirass.git/log/. Clément