From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42574) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibrpc-0003xq-EV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 14:58:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibrpb-0001R5-G6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 14:58:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:32997) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibrpa-0001Qt-Cy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 14:58:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ibrpa-0006oh-BM for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 14:58:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#38459] [PATCH] gnu: (cross-gcc-arguments|gcc-boot0): Enable 128 bit long double for POWER9. Resent-Message-ID: References: <9d5aee30-1cfe-434b-f191-3bbd06caa319@free.fr> In-reply-to: <9d5aee30-1cfe-434b-f191-3bbd06caa319@free.fr> Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 20:57:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87h82its9y.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" Reply-to: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice , Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Guix-patches via To: 38459@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable dftxbs3e, dftxbs3e =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > This is to be applied against core-updates and fixes: > > $ guix build --target=3Dpowerpc64le-linux-gnu bootstrap-tarballs Thanks for sending this in! I'll be sure to merge it if no one=20 else has objections. I'm really not familiar with this part of Guix, though. I'd=20 naively expect this to be guarded with an (if =E2=80=A6) so it only=20 applies to POWER. (Why) is that not possible or desirable? Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEfo+u0AlEeO9y5k0W2Imw8BjFSTwFAl3lbJkACgkQ2Imw8BjF STxwORAAileDBPaaiYhdFu37sCcBQlE7Ays+tgR2BL3DnQh0qdUYFJgciXNQTpFK TbJ1TwwsvU7chjkrhQCkBzNvaKA7ZLMst0l6XblTTtl1qLR+ylR8Qti9pCRrg763 vp1Ss3MQqgYMLLjziTyx+u4L+xwiXwjx4wEPhixou6clCRqUyvERs89AJM5//e2l G3ywD563U1zajJbSuEk2eU6GKdYd9w/W/WvBbxRCetPXfcrjjRODRPaINnlt0K6z T3keriUnJP67LKK7dmqz5r0lfllSZ6n0GwJe+9L/QraaY5blQgpy6GGWJBNmWZ1r ippo8UW/xBZ++d0fAjL8cNjuTbxaswHFQbCJalWZ78tsfyuHOcEHgZoNkhhuNCbo v3wYBT6m3b2Qxrjxa2DA81O8oucuODwIw9q+4cMbeEvIuORRhR23bUWeiOlIuRrT N6qQLDupnvO2u3aNXB/qW31VALWIERdLtBb7O7bifzn5ICrAt1RJEjx9CLtRMirn a7V3t2V32NnoLkTGdgOd9yIZZKNIMUF0kqTw2XEhqBlU3tD1Mt2qHRc6T4R8l0tw 0gSqeO3hzzRavnX8dP0RByuY88LVBTDDNNXwcBYJl4IcSRr5t82evYtyyoEvw5up 7ZEhvRS5JgXaG141hMwurpIH8pmkUrM+ewiNmRME+JsFghLevSU= =aEer -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--