From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vagrant Cascadian Subject: Re: U-boot update revert. Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 12:15:44 -0700 Message-ID: <87h7xaovxb.fsf@yucca> References: <87blni31gh.fsf@gmail.com> <87k126owtc.fsf@yucca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRhKD-0003uR-UF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:15:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRhKD-0000aQ-95 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:15:53 -0400 Received: from cascadia.aikidev.net ([2600:3c01:e000:267:0:a171:de7:c]:50980) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jRhKC-0000XW-Nc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:15:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k126owtc.fsf@yucca> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mathieu Othacehe Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On 2020-04-23, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2020-04-23, Mathieu Othacehe wrote: >> I reverted the U-Boot update to 2020.04 because it breaks the build of >> u-boot-tools package. Could you please have a look? > > Hrm. Pretty sure it worked locally when I committed it... > > Unfortunately, won't have a chance to debug till next week; if anyone > else could look into it sooner that would be great! I did take the time to look at the failed build log: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2602399/details But the log just cuts off for no apparent reason during the unpack phase... I don't think the new u-boot is at fault there. It built successfully on i686, armhf and aarch64 ... and the failed x86_64 test is mysteriously absent? hrm: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/search?query=u-boot-tools-2020.04 But that's not hugely surprising, given that tests are not run on those architectures. Honestly, the most of the test suite run for u-boot-tools is a generic test suite for u-boot sandbox platforms, and most of the tests are unrelated to what u-boot-tools actually provides, so I wonder if it's even appropriate to run many of the tests as part of u-boot-tools... I'm not really sure the best way forward here. live well, vagrant --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQRlgHNhO/zFx+LkXUXcUY/If5cWqgUCXqHpYAAKCRDcUY/If5cW qsdmAQDEODgGeLq130kWaWiUegy92g2X6FkBiPDqSC7JGPvP3AD9GfGH/IwJbH6k jjchZp2qr13IrdJOa7HMyiFldJx0ZAY= =o11t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--