From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 6B51C5y0uV4QJAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 20:25:00 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id GKtuD6q0uV4hPgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 20:25:14 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E64F4940E84 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 20:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35850 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYEzA-0007dk-Qo for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:25:12 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60986) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYEz3-0007ba-C4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:25:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYEyz-0006sH-RQ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:25:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYEyz-0000Bh-O0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:25:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#41140: =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9Cguix_?= =?UTF-8?Q?system=E2=80=9D?= suggests wrong module import when using =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=9Cremove=E2=80=9D?= Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 20:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41140 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ricardo Wurmus Received: via spool by 41140-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41140.1589228646647 (code B ref 41140); Mon, 11 May 2020 20:25:01 +0000 Received: (at 41140) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2020 20:24:06 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53438 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYEy6-0000AN-3E for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:24:06 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57894) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jYEy4-00009f-2d for 41140@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:24:04 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jYExy-0006ja-RQ; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:23:58 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=39054 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jYExy-0002CH-6Y; Mon, 11 May 2020 16:23:58 -0400 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <87lfm22il6.fsf@elephly.net> Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 22:23:55 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87lfm22il6.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Sat, 09 May 2020 00:00:05 +0200") Message-ID: <87h7wmfcf8.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -3.3 (---) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 41140@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -1.01 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-1.01 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.54005364824324]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.51.188.0/24:c]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.07), country: US(-0.00), ip: 209.51.188.17(-0.54)]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[209.51.188.17:server fail]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:209.51.188.0/24, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[ludo@gnu.org,bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[elephly.net:email]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gnu.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[209.51.188.17:from]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.51.188.17:from]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: OsWFcapZx9L8 Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > But now I=E2=80=99m curious and I look at the documentation for =E2=80=9C= remove=E2=80=9D from > (rnrs lists): > > -- Scheme Procedure: remp proc list > -- Scheme Procedure: remove obj list > -- Scheme Procedure: remv obj list > -- Scheme Procedure: remq obj list > =E2=80=98remove=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98remv=E2=80=99, and =E2=80=98remq= =E2=80=99 are identical to the =E2=80=98delete=E2=80=99, =E2=80=98delv=E2= =80=99, > and =E2=80=98delq=E2=80=99 procedures provided by Guile=E2=80=99s co= re library, (*note List > Modification::). =E2=80=98remp=E2=80=99 is identical to the alterna= te =E2=80=98remove=E2=80=99 > procedure provided by SRFI-1; *Note SRFI-1 Deleting::. > > Oh. Bah, R6 is terrible in that respect. > So here are my questions: > > * can we prefer (srfi srfi-1) over (rnrs lists) in the suggestions for = =E2=80=9Cremove=E2=80=9D? I don=E2=80=99t think we should do that. However, listing all the possibilities, as Danny suggests, would be nice. > * can we avoid this by extending modify-services to support =E2=80=9Cdele= te=E2=80=9D > much like modify-phases, and suggesting to use that instead of > =E2=80=9Cremove=E2=80=9D? That=E2=80=99s the better option! Ludo=E2=80=99.