From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id QDfRG9+cq19kQwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:12:15 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id +MipF9+cq18YXwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:12:15 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6DC79404E0 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:12:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59246 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kclEj-0007HC-Qw for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:12:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58434) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kclEY-0007H4-JW for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:12:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:56833) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kclEY-0006ud-9W for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:12:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kclEY-0001m7-3x for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:12:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#44552: Extra dynamic-space-size for asdf-build-system/sbcl? Resent-From: Guillaume Le Vaillant Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44552 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Pierre Neidhardt Received: via spool by 44552-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44552.16050822916785 (code B ref 44552); Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:12:02 +0000 Received: (at 44552) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Nov 2020 08:11:31 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40146 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kclE3-0001lM-42 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:11:31 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:39919) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kclE1-0001l4-30 for 44552@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:11:30 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FF232400FE for <44552@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:11:22 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1605082282; bh=iMk5qdm9unba+7uCYNaDmmBmusJag8dKQ3wr2s4SLyM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=QrjICVxC1THiFWbKqLREaEAhKfF/OUj6DxLF1XuWtZsEUHUkoWucQ16tqcoqK7zPC dKH+aXKMAnOQ+Ych2C2VoVykAJF2cvrnpxOHR1JCA1EVuKTr5rAYf9fhU6/B3tvpxP 0EsD7tpnhtO46dpPpyPbxWqAV/EdRGeOdnoo4gMrRsQ4j7YovhHwGGwCNjPnRAx5OG lijeQ31n1P8g9OZryuLbvJ/vuLlPSYtVuGDcfTmsZSyQXx/eQ5/Q726W3vX0p5ugwS ke+EpN2Z1FS+p3cjha4ydGypRcAHiu/0HmC3HJg3wmOjhyvituh7oWztHHjynveatl PHR2kf7+DfDPw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4CWHVw3mFwz6tmc; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:11:20 +0100 (CET) References: <87sg9hida6.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87d00l1f9g.fsf@yamatai> <875z6di2ni.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87a6vp17a0.fsf@yamatai> <87lff9gf2q.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87ft5hgc7p.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.13; emacs 27.1 From: Guillaume Le Vaillant In-reply-to: <87ft5hgc7p.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:11:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87h7pwtisg.fsf@yamatai> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.3 (-) X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 44552@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=QrjICVxC; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.51 X-TUID: V4hiQZYVV1YR --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Pierre Neidhardt skribis: > Pierre Neidhardt writes: > >> It failed with "5Gb", it worked with "6000". >> I'm testing with "5000" since upstream said it worked for them. > > Nope, it does not :p > > So which value should we set? It's not because 6000 passes on my > machine that it will necessary pass on all the Guix build servers. > > I'm leaning towards disabling the tests for generic-cl. What do you think? If the tests don't run reliably, disabling them sounds like a good idea. IIRC the tests of sbcl-numcl are disabled because of a similar problem. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIUEAREKAC0WIQTLxZxm7Ce5cXlAaz5r6CCK3yH+PwUCX6ucnw8cZ2x2QHBvc3Rl by5uZXQACgkQa+ggit8h/j87ZwEAo6yUAtJUEWQz0Ad23pCkUuYHa/nHpbAAYmsl 6864fdMA/i20/rg3f/leKxLgCnR+XbCXFAEN6nr7nwUtlwZR2Ztd =et6y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--