From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id CGfVEKv3PGD2dgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:18:19 +0000 Received: from aspmx2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:c151::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id kMWiDKv3PGBuZgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:18:19 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx2.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 641D0BF53 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 15:18:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:40382 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjNH-0007ZL-RL for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:18:15 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39690) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjKA-0005en-UZ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:15:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:37012) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjKA-0001J1-Mr for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:15:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjKA-0006qK-I6 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#46844: guile2.2-bytestructures fails to compile. Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46844 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Maxime Devos Received: via spool by 46844-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46844.161460807026230 (code B ref 46844); Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 46844) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Mar 2021 14:14:30 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48555 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjJe-0006p0-22 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:14:30 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49810) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjJc-0006on-VD for 46844@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:14:29 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45368) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjJU-0000zv-QX; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:14:22 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=54232 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lGjJR-00026W-10; Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:14:18 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <3f495538d371826b84b9ec6864503c60844c1d95.camel@telenet.be> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 15:14:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3f495538d371826b84b9ec6864503c60844c1d95.camel@telenet.be> (Maxime Devos's message of "Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:06:49 +0100") Message-ID: <87h7lvrmfc.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 46844@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1614608299; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=GrGq3y7VzgOyirFT3m0kOxLwDTqvqrzMUoSqoJCbihw=; b=R4/RKa9Jx1IzljdUFYkyA5ZfbKSnR+l2EYXpWquNQxwy5s8vA358W3HNY2t4Gn2RnyRMh7 P26AFquValbVB0YcslV9D12+wcDl7eKbAjG9d3oqShQNCB1ImGaoCiqb2wbtJ2KPomigAd RXnfokZ3JOqZbg0L+giLHv4irMl6VIL2bfC0snNlw6QarcYu5g1btFBWVj16DcCb28xDzm sKwItlBBhL3Xo094JN1h7uohqIX6FaJonaff9erMUD4ADZcRH4s/1XogkEcRDnLOq2KPTH /uBdVWwOT8c0pPQF7+hre8qd2RYqJi4GXgmlqGi70eSZSTyM/vYswnw8QAsKiA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1614608299; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=CVRrWmll85P6WFw6Sjs6K3gWlrnUyTelvvGNtiR4wnuXkfDQqL3nBm3QzUBlIHf8OdxiUt 8VIw3mADLzUcdlX9YgkUbC/qZauw1qKM6EOeAzvJFLKfZcQ9To3Gyd2QpU9i1/b+7iWmB2 jcRr49p92MPS611TuxexwpWkyNrOfSEDWRReU3hytgaGnOyaBFk4KfMaaDxs3Qw6i25q8+ SkaHCmwFmuMlGBcm9fksi9oxKWjBLc0wZXFBR2FMBcxmE2ETVXf/5XjaZH7PWCVpTZ7UQd 3JdT5498uVFwfdj385AJO9mOpEGSyhCxr4UHu7BN460J4y7AewoHYKTJZ3BP/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx2.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx2.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.86 Authentication-Results: aspmx2.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx2.migadu.com: domain of bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bug-guix-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 641D0BF53 X-Spam-Score: -2.86 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: HgXacLKmMnqk Hi, Maxime Devos skribis: > guile2.2-bytestructures and guile2.0-bytestructures don't compile. > The reason seems to be that v1.0.9 uses (scheme eval), which isn't > defined in guile2.0 and guile2.2. v1.0.8 doesn't use (scheme eval) Perhaps worth reporting upstream. > Here's the commit that seems to introduce the issue while fixing > another: > > guix time-machine --commit=3D0a1da4652d9bb93d530ca52710f30b5d05a4251d -- = build guile2.0-bytestructures guile2.2-bytestructures > > According to a "guix refresh --list-dependent guile2.0-bytestructures gui= le2.2-bytestructures" > on 372b15f8625e7f20cafdba2677d4bf3f5eccc127, only "guile2.0-git", > "guile2.2-parted" and "guile2.2-guix" depend on these packages, > so unless someone needs "guile2.2-guix", it should be safe to remove > these packages. =E2=80=98guile2.2-guix=E2=80=99 exists mostly to check compatibility with 2= .2. I=E2=80=99d like to drop 2.2 support soonish, though it=E2=80=99s okay to keep as long as it= =E2=80=99s not a burden (which it=E2=80=99s slowly becoming). Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.