From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 2CWjCY5cQ2AUFQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:42:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id UGpZBY5cQ2C8dgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:42:22 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9A52EA76 for ; Sat, 6 Mar 2021 11:42:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54144 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIUO4-0001M2-1P for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:42:20 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIUNm-0001L2-BK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:42:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52808) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIUNm-0000Ik-3x for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:42:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIUNm-0000hV-0m for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:42:02 -0500 Subject: bug#46784: [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License. Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 46784 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: 46784-done@debbugs.gnu.org, lle-bout@zaclys.net, Nicolas Goaziou Mail-Followup-To: 46784@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org, alex@zrythm.org Received: via spool by 46784-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D46784.16150272732617 (code D ref 46784); Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:42:01 +0000 Received: (at 46784-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2021 10:41:13 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36117 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIUMz-0000g9-Jg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:41:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52122) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lIUMt-0000fp-W6 for 46784-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:41:12 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36943) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lIUMn-000815-VF; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:41:01 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=37878 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lIUMn-00024C-Eh; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:41:01 -0500 From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= References: <20210225234150.20653-1-alex@zrythm.org> <9da8d5272386896d150143acc82ae4fb1ca82138.camel@zaclys.net> <87r1l1203h.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874khx5tl9.fsf@nckx> Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 11:40:59 +0100 In-Reply-To: <874khx5tl9.fsf@nckx> (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice's message of "Sat, 27 Feb 2021 18:05:54 +0100") Message-ID: <87h7loimys.fsf_-_@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1615027341; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-to: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post; bh=63L9L4do+aibb0CFGyiR5km6oUvV9oORsFYV27UW9Tw=; b=P+t8knfYFB9qIqNWZwlYFRlmUX+dMyAiSM5HMqn8k319X1Li7vZj/VJ5N68fI6VbMXuCIg UTQLJJeP4+o3l4elOF+Xqg7pDQJp3ojuFLEQvosVhxJIssL3ZBaDcNVFJEb2uZXxTfDA3J q7hKcjgHsqqOIfSRfPRrsg2CWBNv57Vvu8lNGIYWdqO3rnEMxWzru3itFsZL6lWBSIUOro AsPWz1OVyOgMCYr8Lnt7ns0j+ra3eeG6KsaT7uwBewg8plfmNekp6WIevLDgNoa1uqhoNt 6dbEHE4377GN7/7ufIWTnzDnqUzUxKCmCdyO4XihdsqbH5x02jEtV+DqBw1upg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1615027341; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=caQNsS5M96JveMtf8v5Kv7KZkYpebHIX5qr6sd1J5b2ikKzRE/HVrKXUdBHNTSn/ZxnuLp FViswfVlvElt2NgwIfRFuY1DMMyH4PudfZuIqfX+4fwYzYI3LK2jGxntTv6Donx6OAiYFs gs9rcpWed+5vxmBwtBDpkL01uRbM8b2hLQeoEThX+LI52fXY0DWxX96sPA16/pJr/GhouI iPhxGLpyRADPA0j/caFrjE+WRaqGoWM8KRqZH+Q/KBHAxy7zxdOyvzxWlB3MEFQcOHgHjd 6lm+U3i/0S2owD0huFQvjq1WZhYFvbpFEhv2LKGlK72calGpXPMaOFzjdF0Xdg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.87 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: CF9A52EA76 X-Spam-Score: -2.87 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: BpIm9ip1+tqQ Hi! Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis: > Nicolas Goaziou =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> OTOH, bsd-0 is not totally accurate either, because zero-clause BSD >> is >> not a BSD derivative. So, here come my nitpick: what about zero-bsd? > > I disagree (disclaimer: I'm the one who suggested =E2=80=98bsd-0=E2=80=99= to Alex :-) > that accuracy is implied or valuable. Guix maps =E2=80=98n-clause-BSD=E2= =80=99 to > =E2=80=98bsd-n=E2=80=99, we get (marginally) fewer requests to add =E2=80= =98missing=E2=80=99 licences, > all is well with the world. > > It's true that the 0-clause BSD licence was based on the ISC text; > that doesn't make it any less of a BSD licence. That requires=20 > claiming that OpenBSD is not under a BSD licence either, which is > a... certain kind of correct. This is an interesting discussion :-), but in the interest of moving forward, I applied the =E2=80=98bsd-0=E2=80=99 patch. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.