From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms11 with LMTPS
	id 2CWjCY5cQ2AUFQAA0tVLHw
	(envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:42:22 +0000
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp2 with LMTPS
	id UGpZBY5cQ2C8dgAAB5/wlQ
	(envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:42:22 +0000
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9A52EA76
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat,  6 Mar 2021 11:42:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:54144 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1lIUO4-0001M2-1P
	for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:42:20 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41912)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1lIUNm-0001L2-BK
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:42:02 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52808)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1lIUNm-0000Ik-3x
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:42:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1lIUNm-0000hV-0m
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:42:02 -0500
Subject: bug#46784: [PATCH 1/2] guix: Add Zero-Clause BSD License.
Resent-From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:42:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.46784.D46784.16150272732617.done@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 46784
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
Cc: 46784-done@debbugs.gnu.org, lle-bout@zaclys.net,
 Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mail-Followup-To: 46784@debbugs.gnu.org, ludo@gnu.org, alex@zrythm.org
Received: via spool by 46784-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D46784.16150272732617
 (code D ref 46784); Sat, 06 Mar 2021 10:42:01 +0000
Received: (at 46784-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Mar 2021 10:41:13 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36117 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1lIUMz-0000g9-Jg
 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:41:13 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52122)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1lIUMt-0000fp-W6
 for 46784-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:41:12 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:36943)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
 id 1lIUMn-000815-VF; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:41:01 -0500
Received: from [2a01:e0a:1d:7270:af76:b9b:ca24:c465] (port=37878 helo=ribbon)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
 id 1lIUMn-00024C-Eh; Sat, 06 Mar 2021 05:41:01 -0500
From: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
References: <20210225234150.20653-1-alex@zrythm.org>
 <9da8d5272386896d150143acc82ae4fb1ca82138.camel@zaclys.net>
 <87r1l1203h.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874khx5tl9.fsf@nckx>
Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 11:40:59 +0100
In-Reply-To: <874khx5tl9.fsf@nckx> (Tobias Geerinckx-Rice's message of "Sat,
 27 Feb 2021 18:05:54 +0100")
Message-ID: <87h7loimys.fsf_-_@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org;
	s=key1; t=1615027341;
	h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:
	 message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:
	 content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-to:
	 resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:
	 references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:
	 list-subscribe:list-post; bh=63L9L4do+aibb0CFGyiR5km6oUvV9oORsFYV27UW9Tw=;
	b=P+t8knfYFB9qIqNWZwlYFRlmUX+dMyAiSM5HMqn8k319X1Li7vZj/VJ5N68fI6VbMXuCIg
	UTQLJJeP4+o3l4elOF+Xqg7pDQJp3ojuFLEQvosVhxJIssL3ZBaDcNVFJEb2uZXxTfDA3J
	q7hKcjgHsqqOIfSRfPRrsg2CWBNv57Vvu8lNGIYWdqO3rnEMxWzru3itFsZL6lWBSIUOro
	AsPWz1OVyOgMCYr8Lnt7ns0j+ra3eeG6KsaT7uwBewg8plfmNekp6WIevLDgNoa1uqhoNt
	6dbEHE4377GN7/7ufIWTnzDnqUzUxKCmCdyO4XihdsqbH5x02jEtV+DqBw1upg==
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1615027341; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none;
	b=caQNsS5M96JveMtf8v5Kv7KZkYpebHIX5qr6sd1J5b2ikKzRE/HVrKXUdBHNTSn/ZxnuLp
	FViswfVlvElt2NgwIfRFuY1DMMyH4PudfZuIqfX+4fwYzYI3LK2jGxntTv6Donx6OAiYFs
	gs9rcpWed+5vxmBwtBDpkL01uRbM8b2hLQeoEThX+LI52fXY0DWxX96sPA16/pJr/GhouI
	iPhxGLpyRADPA0j/caFrjE+WRaqGoWM8KRqZH+Q/KBHAxy7zxdOyvzxWlB3MEFQcOHgHjd
	6lm+U3i/0S2owD0huFQvjq1WZhYFvbpFEhv2LKGlK72calGpXPMaOFzjdF0Xdg==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1;
	aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=none;
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org
X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.87
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=none;
	dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org
X-Migadu-Queue-Id: CF9A52EA76
X-Spam-Score: -2.87
X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com
X-TUID: BpIm9ip1+tqQ

Hi!

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> skribis:

> Nicolas Goaziou =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A
>> OTOH, bsd-0 is not totally accurate either, because zero-clause BSD
>> is
>> not a BSD derivative. So, here come my nitpick: what about zero-bsd?
>
> I disagree (disclaimer: I'm the one who suggested =E2=80=98bsd-0=E2=80=99=
 to Alex :-)
> that accuracy is implied or valuable.  Guix maps =E2=80=98n-clause-BSD=E2=
=80=99 to
> =E2=80=98bsd-n=E2=80=99, we get (marginally) fewer requests to add =E2=80=
=98missing=E2=80=99 licences,
> all is well with the world.
>
> It's true that the 0-clause BSD licence was based on the ISC text;
> that doesn't make it any less of a BSD licence.  That requires=20
> claiming that OpenBSD is not under a BSD licence either, which is
> a... certain kind of correct.

This is an interesting discussion :-), but in the interest of moving
forward, I applied the =E2=80=98bsd-0=E2=80=99 patch.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.