From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:700:3204::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0E79AQ+Hj2VW/AAAkFu2QA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 03:57:19 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id 2DGBOA6Hj2VulAAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 03:57:19 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=EbG5QnNG; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1703905038; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=+xLWYrgJBc/B2bhrJ5MRRupnrZwIfODX2fotI0SL/70=; b=j1wyNxm4Y8MP9L6JPUAXX9BKT+h/FZxIIbsErxhYFwmS83nNH1Rz2szd4GdRT84NHw0wyg 6MpVDEaic8/NyHa3GQunxUx8c1bA4bHmL+Sp9xaV/OB43zRG353ZQPFjGyFAlFB8+ZrnQ6 S1PUIt6bzsf2GFXnfAWDWaYy4C4B9oLE3PJ8SH/5df/S4Cys0imOgPmM+f5Dfmns65XcMA KjH84lldIG/8PF23UtPA7/jmsPTGqJu2YowwILFHqeXyXQ1nojDrv72nEqWkhyRCerR5CZ fb8ZOeAzIAbh/Q+jkTKxREQivUZRo/+kiEAfQMGTXW3UruoHiA6LcjR17kc44Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=EbG5QnNG; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=riseup.net (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1703905038; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=HgMRWIWAlxkOgw1nR4nyjPEeFLoUtm70LUhGIE9m9ASdh7d8k+cka1smG5IC0keuqxZU0i 2Nqxl0f7mAIhj/lSyxJheeWUubSU2evbX7qYpASnQxjWEBvW7EDzO8YHktlDhc0T9jp2RV CoqD1QswMGk03H6Y0sWP+bS4n/nFp+9UQ1iy3vGEi7oblT9stLzKGuie7eoSKfxf+Br3On VkPE7rgQ0paFpOwWiGVtIHVG8rKO2+MF+q8hMQO06TmzkNZVAt/0BnbKwidMSl1LdOfG8B pRgElCJ3SJCUmftFDKr7KRpXvkXJwpY2+ykZlWpXp9d3EBVVOGgg40J+CLd3Hw== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31668620F9 for ; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 03:57:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rJPX6-0004fJ-6F; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 21:57:04 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rJPX4-0004ex-5c for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 21:57:02 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rJPX3-0005qg-NC for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 21:57:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rJPX3-00055T-Mb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 21:57:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#64360: error: ghc-onetuple: unbound variable Resent-From: Csepp Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 02:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 64360 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Csepp Cc: 64360@debbugs.gnu.org, Simon Tournier Received: via spool by 64360-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B64360.170390496819485 (code B ref 64360); Sat, 30 Dec 2023 02:57:01 +0000 Received: (at 64360) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Dec 2023 02:56:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42742 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rJPWB-00054C-Ry for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 21:56:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:51856) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rJPW8-00053a-0m for 64360@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Dec 2023 21:56:07 -0500 Received: from fews01-sea.riseup.net (fews01-sea-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.109]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4T26Lz45z1zDqLp; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 02:55:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1703904955; bh=vI8huOXTtzRYTXxWBVAA3Pf7MDlgjYnDVgouS/nS5j4=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:From; b=EbG5QnNGIjF6OGkPeKwIY/W7uSJ9JyiR8tw9RWWGU6XtgQotSnc6DlSQN3ROovJ8H /TTFHfh7hA4XPJCpmKoTD2b3J/mWdh5HBcSx2s8S0NCN21ZNRNqmTnfnITV0GpFZxB 6es7FaxGo2LCOuCAAhaqFVD4WxcZKj5HcHwOV+vM= X-Riseup-User-ID: 3CE46D2726AA6EF556104FC6DEBFD176D6F0C07589E67FC9559226D5940E6D8F Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fews01-sea.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4T26Ly69bSzJp2C; Sat, 30 Dec 2023 02:55:54 +0000 (UTC) References: <87ilb5hiec.fsf@riseup.net> <87zfz3ciup.fsf@gmail.com> <87wmt96sw5.fsf@riseup.net> From: Csepp Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2023 03:50:16 +0100 In-reply-to: <87wmt96sw5.fsf@riseup.net> Message-ID: <87h6k0o0um.fsf@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.24 X-Spam-Score: -5.24 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 31668620F9 X-TUID: 0wzJFbrQa9GK Csepp writes: > Simon Tournier writes: > >> Hi, >> >> Could you confirm on i686 native machine that you are able to reproduce >> the error with: >> >> $ guix time-machine --commit=3D 63660f0 -- shell yt-dlp >> >> ? >> >> >> On Fri, 30 Jun 2023 at 02:56, Csepp wrote: >> >>> $ guix shell yt-dlp >>> Backtrace: >>> In srfi/srfi-1.scm: >>> 586:17 19 (map1 (#< name: "yt-dlp" version: "202=E2= =80=A6>)) >>> In guix/profiles.scm: >>> 1932:19 18 (_ _) >>> In guix/packages.scm: >>> 1371:17 17 (supported-package? # =E2=80=A6) >>> In guix/memoization.scm: >>> 101:0 16 (_ # # =E2=80=A6) >>> In guix/packages.scm: >>> 1349:39 15 (_) >>> 1611:16 14 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _) >>> 1715:47 13 (thunk) >>> In gnu/packages/video.scm: >>> 2615:11 12 (native-inputs #) >>> In guix/packages.scm: >>> 1371:17 11 (supported-package? # =E2=80=A6) >>> In guix/memoization.scm: >>> 101:0 10 (_ # # =E2=80=A6) >>> In guix/packages.scm: >>> 1349:39 9 (_) >>> 1611:16 8 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _) >>> 1712:48 7 (thunk) >>> In gnu/packages/haskell-xyz.scm: >>> 9121:35 6 (inputs #) >>> In guix/packages.scm: >>> 1424:32 5 (package-closure _ #:system _) >>> 1611:16 4 (package->bag _ _ _ #:graft? _) >>> 1712:48 3 (thunk) >>> In gnu/packages/haskell-web.scm: >>> 943:18 2 (inputs #) >>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm: >>> 1685:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) >>> 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _) >>> >>> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception: >>> error: ghc-onetuple: unbound variable >> >>> Running guix search ghc-onetuple indeed does not turn anything up. >>> guix search ghc-aeson results in the same error halfway through >>> outputting the description for ghc-aeson. >> >> The package ghc-onetuple is defined. As far I can read, it is as the >> same place since 49a320aaa6fb4c20d6b30c56c35a8c7ffceed822: >> >> AuthorDate: Sun Jan 15 10:09:44 2023 +0100 >> CommitDate: Sun Feb 26 10:26:07 2023 +0100 >> >> And in this report speaks elsewhere about >> 63660f0febb4aa0d5260791c82dfde15c0df4c79, which comes after: >> >> AuthorDate: Tue Jun 27 15:43:27 2023 -0400 >> CommitDate: Tue Jun 27 15:43:27 2023 -0400 >> >> For instance, see [1]. Therefore, I do not think the issue comes from >> that. Running, >> >> $ guix time-machine --commit=3D 63660f0 -- shell -s i686-linux yt-dlp >> >> I get the error: >> >> build of /gnu/store/n2yl83p37j9mazjh58d5fxixjiq188px-ghc-base64-0.4.= 2.4.drv failed >> >> and the message reads: >> >> starting phase `check' >> running "runhaskell Setup.hs" with command "test" and parameters () >> Running 1 test suites... >> Test suite tasty: RUNNING... >> >> Test suite tasty: FAIL >> Test suite logged to: dist/test/base64-0.4.2.4-tasty.log >> 0 of 1 test suites (0 of 1 test cases) passed. >> error: in phase 'check': uncaught exception: >> %exception #<&invoke-error program: "runhaskell" arguments: ("-package-d= b=3D/tmp/guix-build-ghc-base64-0.4.2.4.drv-0/package.conf.d" "Setup.hs" "te= st") exit-status: 1 term-signal: #f stop-signal: #f> >> phase `check' failed after 0.3 seconds >> >> >> 1: >> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/haskell-xyz= .scm?id=3D63660f0febb4aa0d5260791c82dfde15c0df4c79#n15164 >> >> Cheers, >> simon > > Got an error, but not the same one. > > ... > building /gnu/store/c7vzg80lankn28pmb53lhfclgw8xdnxk-inferior-script.scm.= drv... > building package cache... > building profile with 1 package... > hint: Consider passing the `--check' option once to make sure your shell = does not clobber environment variables. > > Backtrace: > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 222:29 19 (map1 _) > 222:29 18 (map1 _) > 222:29 17 (map1 _) > 222:29 16 (map1 _) > 222:29 15 (map1 _) > 222:29 14 (map1 _) > 222:29 13 (map1 _) > 222:29 12 (map1 _) > 222:17 11 (map1 (((gnu packages tex)) ((gnu packages xml)) ((=E2=80=A6= )) =E2=80=A6)) > 3327:17 10 (resolve-interface (gnu packages tex) #:select _ #:hide =E2= =80=A6) > In ice-9/threads.scm: > 390:8 9 (_ _) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 3253:13 8 (_) > In ice-9/threads.scm: > 390:8 7 (_ _) > In ice-9/boot-9.scm: > 3544:20 6 (_) > 2836:4 5 (save-module-excursion _) > 3564:26 4 (_) > In unknown file: > 3 (primitive-load-path "gnu/packages/tex" #) > In gnu/packages/tex.scm: > GC Warning: Failed to expand heap by 8388608 bytes > ...repeats a bunch of times... > GC Warning: Failed to expand heap by 8388608 bytes > GC Warning: Failed to expand heap by 65536 bytes > GC Warning: Out of Memory! Heap size: 2498 MiB. Returning NULL! > Exception thrown while printing backtrace: > Out of memory > > ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception: > error: license:arphic-1999: unbound variable And another error with a pull from about an hour ago, this is from trying to reconfigure. Pull was offloaded from the i686 netbook to the x86_64 PC. guix describe: Generation 21 Dec 30 2023 02:54:01 (current) guix f76ca2b repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git branch: master commit: f76ca2b0e894c244d5011a32b30dee8fd874e322 raingloom b528a4a repository URL: https://git.sr.ht/~raingloom/guix-packages branch: master commit: b528a4a906011efb52bc4db916408c5f12f387ec nonguix 8956906 repository URL: https://gitlab.com/nonguix/nonguix.git branch: master commit: 8956906f6bed6709e71f0c26ed6a3620f40dc487 ./pre-inst-env guile --no-auto-compile raingloom/machines.scm Backtrace: In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 1752:10 6 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _) In unknown file: 5 (apply-smob/0 #) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 724:2 4 (call-with-prompt _ _ #) In ice-9/eval.scm: 619:8 3 (_ #(#(#))) In ice-9/boot-9.scm: 2836:4 2 (save-module-excursion _) 4388:12 1 (_) In gnu/services.scm: 419:6 0 (_) gnu/services.scm:419:6: error: %modify-services: unbound variable pre-inst-env just prepends my config repo to the GUILE_LOAD_PATH, this specific file has some shared definitions for my actual machine configs. It doesn't do anything weird, no module reflection, etc, just a plain declarative module.