From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Are we still using Gobby?
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 16:29:27 +0200
Message-ID: <87fvwrmk6w.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87k3m43kfp.fsf@karetnikov.org>
	<201306081848.35006.andreas@enge.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33074)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1UlghS-0005ym-DI
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:34:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1UlghR-0007P5-E6
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:34:30 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:56226)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1UlghR-0007P1-80
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 10:34:29 -0400
In-Reply-To: <201306081848.35006.andreas@enge.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of
	"Sat, 8 Jun 2013 18:48:34 +0200")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: bug-guix@gnu.org

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> Am Samstag, 8. Juni 2013 schrieb Nikita Karetnikov:
>> I've noticed that the TASKS file is a bit outdated.  Are we still using
>> it?
>
> I am. But I also have nothing against adding a file to the git repository=
=20
> instead.

Well, whichever works best for you people.  Using a DVCS has a different
set of drawbacks for this particular job, but it has the advantage of
being more familiar, I think.

Ludo=E2=80=99.