From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Searchable archive at MARC? Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2014 15:08:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87fvlvkhfe.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20140402054440.GR10315@marklar.spinoli.org> <20140402072156.GA22530@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38309) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVKu4-0005lI-Pq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:08:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVKtz-0003sm-PT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:08:28 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:56244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WVKtz-0003sW-Io for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Apr 2014 09:08:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20140402072156.GA22530@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Wed, 2 Apr 2014 09:21:56 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: Hank Leininger , guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 01:44:40AM -0400, Hank Leininger wrote: >> Would there be any objection to the guix lists being added? > > I am not in favour of any external body hosting copies of our mailing lis= t. > There is an archive at gnu, that is indexed by search engines, and I do n= ot > see which problem an additional copy solves. Given the subject of Hank=E2=80=99s message, I suppose MARC is more easily searchable. I personally don=E2=80=99t have anything against it, especiall= y if it makes people=E2=80=99s lives easier. For the record, our lists are also mirrored at GMane: http://gmane.org/find.php?list=3Dguix > I am not a lawyer, but I also think it is illegal without the explicit > permission of each and every poster, who holds the copyright to their > contribution. Well, in practice, when posting to an open (as opposed to invitation-only) mailing list with a public archive, one implicitly accepts the message to be visible by anyone, unless X-No-Archive or similar is used. My 2=C2=A2, Ludo=E2=80=99.