From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] gnu: cross-base: Make it aware of non-Linux (ie. Hurd)
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:09:47 +0100
Message-ID: <87fvad3d7o.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <54D39A0B.5090409@gmx.com> <871tm1xqcw.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAFtzXzPb-gH6ZnZDqY_pShp3pW_z9ZEoHvXEqbLm6aNSnFNmGQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87d25h4ttt.fsf@gnu.org> <54DA33D5.1030301@gmx.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49817)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YLEJu-0001M5-15
	for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:09:55 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YLEJp-0003gv-R3
	for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:09:53 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:60694)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1YLEJp-0003gr-Nt
	for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:09:49 -0500
In-Reply-To: <54DA33D5.1030301@gmx.com> (Marek Benc's message of "Tue, 10 Feb
	2015 17:37:41 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Marek Benc <dusxmt@gmx.com>
Cc: Guix-devel <Guix-devel@gnu.org>

Marek Benc <dusxmt@gmx.com> skribis:

> On 02/10/2015 05:25 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>
>>
>> As I suggested to Manolis, could you make sure that this doesn=E2=80=99t=
 break
>> the existing GNU/Linux cross-toolchains?
>>
>> Namely, could you run:
>>
>>    guix build -e '(@ (gnu packages cross-base) xgcc-armhf)'
>>
>
> I've tested most of my patches with:
>
> $ guix build coreutils --target=3Di686-pc-linux-gnu; # 32bit x86 GNU/Linux
>
> since I can very easily test whether those binaries work (my virtual
> machine is an x86_64), and it all worked so far, but I'll check the
> armhf xgcc as well.

OK, very well.  So you can go ahead, thanks!

Ludo=E2=80=99.