From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Torrenting GuixSD!
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 22:47:43 +0100
Message-ID: <87fv9t3bpc.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <54DE3317.7090002@riseup.net> <87vbj5e83e.fsf@fsf.org>
	<20150213205028.3f7cb9ba@PocketWee> <87wq382w45.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20150223205440.GA25828@debian> <87vbiqw0o4.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20150225141215.GA5109@debian.math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
	<87oaoidn19.fsf@netris.org>
	<20150225175156.GA6653@debian.math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37188)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YQjoF-0005qs-F4
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:48:00 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1YQjoC-0001VO-A6
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:47:59 -0500
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52347)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1YQjoC-0001VK-7e
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2015 16:47:56 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20150225175156.GA6653@debian.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> (Andreas
	Enge's message of "Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:51:56 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Polchi <polchi.dabarov@riseup.net>

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:32:50AM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
>> If we were to extend this argument to non-torrent downloads, then all
>> of our downloads (source tarballs and images) should be tar files
>> containing a signature bundled with the thing being signed.  mit-krb5
>> follows this policy with their source tarballs.
>
> No, extending this argument to non-torrent downloads means that we should
> advertise the signature next to the actual file.

What about having the .sig URL right next the the Torrent URI on the web
page?  I think it would work the same in terms of =E2=80=9Ceducation=E2=80=
=9D.

Ludo=E2=80=99.