From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: bug#20081: patch-source-shebangs crashes on broken symlink Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:18:53 -0400 Message-ID: <87fv9bz3rm.fsf@netris.org> References: <20150311150211.GK16813@crashnator.suse.cz> <20150311173230.GA12508@debian.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVn5v-0003T3-PX for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:19:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVn5q-00086C-GL for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:19:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44595) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YVn5q-000865-DN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:19:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YVn5p-00043P-SJ for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:19:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20150311173230.GA12508@debian.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of "Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:32:30 +0100") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=C4=8Cech?= , 20081@debbugs.gnu.org Andreas Enge writes: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 04:02:11PM +0100, Tom=C3=A1=C5=A1 =C4=8Cech wrote: >> I'm trying to create package for taskwarrior. >> Source tarball contain symlinks to nonexisting file `task': > > I would argue that this is not a bug in guix, but in the tarball. > You can remove the link with an additional phase before 'configure, see, = for > instance, the dvdisaster package in cdrom.scm. The phase should go after the 'unpack' phase rather than before configure, but otherwise I agree with Andreas. Mark