From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Lirzin Subject: Re: [PATCH] for gnu/packages/*.scm rewrite http to https for gnu.org, emacs.scm: add tls for elpa (https://elpa.gnu.org) Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 19:18:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87fusdt5mf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160611155519.GA24412@khazad-dum> <87d1nnofcb.fsf@gnu.org> <20160611170813.GA3959@khazad-dum> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42112) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDavi-00085F-2E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:18:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDavc-0007nb-8g for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:18:08 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49825) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bDavc-0007nW-5I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:18:04 -0400 Received: from mek33-4-82-236-46-88.fbx.proxad.net ([82.236.46.88]:54618 helo=godel) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bDavb-0003YV-CD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2016 13:18:03 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160611170813.GA3959@khazad-dum> (ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is's message of "Sat, 11 Jun 2016 17:08:13 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org ng0 writes: > On 2016-06-11(06:33:24PM+0200), Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > >> I have noticed that this patch modifies the copying permission statement >> too. Since they are copied from >> , I think it would be >> preferable to modify the original before. >> >> Could you ask to apply this change on the website first >> and then make a separate patch for making Guix conform to it? >> >> Sorry for these administrative boredoms. :) >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Mathieu Lirzin > > I will do that, thanks for pointing it out to me. > The last 2 patches might have included this change too, could you > or someone else check up on them? Your last 2 patches are not affected. > I will write an email to GNU now with an reference to this post > and inquire about the change. Thanks. -- Mathieu Lirzin