From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Sphinx reproducibility update Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 23:54:02 +0200 Message-ID: <87furqcrr9.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8737ns194b.fsf@member.fsf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33999) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJpL8-0007iU-91 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 17:54:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bJpL4-0007yj-2U for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 17:54:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8737ns194b.fsf@member.fsf.org> (=?utf-8?B?IuWui+aWh+atpiIn?= =?utf-8?B?cw==?= message of "Sat, 02 Jul 2016 21:07:32 +0800") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6) skribis: > Leo Famulari writes: >> [...] >> >> With this change, many Python 2 packages will become reproducible, at >> least on a single machine; the only thing holding them back was the >> manpage timestamps. > Cool! > >> >> These changes will require 142 rebuilds, mostly of Python packages, but >> also of libreoffice (libreoffice seems to depend on *everything*) and a >> few others. If the patches are good, should they go to master or to >> another branch? >> > I prefer master, and I guess people who use libreoffice don't update it > frequently (we have a old version, but no one complain so far). (Oops, I replied before seeing your message.) I have a slight preference for =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99, which I hope can be merged w= ithin a few days. Sounds good? Ludo=E2=80=99.