From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: st: Mov to terminals.scm.
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2016 19:14:25 -0400
Message-ID: <87fuqeq2em.fsf@netris.org>
References: <871t20ahcb.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87y44892ku.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87r39zmldt.fsf@member.fsf.org>
	<874m6vc5mx.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50107)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1bWtkz-0002rd-Rr
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 19:14:54 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1bWtku-0000PJ-Pq
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 19:14:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: <874m6vc5mx.fsf@gnu.org> (Mathieu Lirzin's message of "Mon, 08
	Aug 2016 23:28:22 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org> writes:

> iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6) writes:
>
>> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I think it's pointless to have a suckless.scm which bundles all software
>>> which just happens to follow suckless ideology/goals or be hosted
>>> there.
>>> That's why I did not commit ii to suckless but to irc.scm, no one will
>>> look into suckless.scm when what they really are looking for is not
>>> $suckless but application xy.
>>> I try to unbundle and remove suckless.scm with the next patches.
>>
>> Well, it's difficult to choose the "right" category for packages.
>> For example, 'dmenu' shouldn't go to 'wm.scm', it has nothing to
>> do with window managers.
>>
>> When a project makes multiple softwares, I think it's easier to
>> put all of them in one project file, eg: gnome and freedesktop.
>
> So you are in favour of keeping (gnu packages suckless)?

Fwiw, I'm in favor of keeping suckless.scm, and rejecting these proposed
package moves.

     Mark