From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add qscintilla. Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:59:31 -0400 Message-ID: <87fup3d3sc.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <87a8fddnyi.fsf@openmailbox.org> <87r38ndfwb.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160913170529.GD20731@jasmine> <87k2efd6gy.fsf@openmailbox.org> <20160913181404.GA4295@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34930) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjsvm-0002Xc-G3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:59:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjsvi-0005FQ-AW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:59:41 -0400 Received: from smtp14.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.48]:48695) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjsvi-0005Eh-0s for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:59:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160913181404.GA4295@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:14:04 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 02:01:33PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: >> Like below? And how could I then access qscintilla-for-octave from >> maths.scm if it isn't defined publicly? > > Yes, that looks right. But I would put qscintilla-for-octave in > maths.scm to avoid the issue you describe. So would you say that this is clean enough that I could push both of these changes in their respecitive files before modifying the Octave definition?