From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: bug#28167: decide how to deal with gschemas Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 15:58:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87fuclvx7w.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20170820200438.kouji7n6hkr2i6hz@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51064) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djnEQ-00044g-Tv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:59:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djnEM-0003RX-IN for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:59:07 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39215) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1djnEM-0003RP-FI for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:59:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1djnEM-0007W5-41 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:59:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <20170820200438.kouji7n6hkr2i6hz@abyayala> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: ng0 Cc: 28167@debbugs.gnu.org ng0 writes: > Creating manual page database for 59 packages... done in 2.152 s > warning: collision encountered: /gnu/store/7dq7vkvrykv3wm9l8j617v3xbn44g51i-epiphany-3.24.3/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled /gnu/store/1c7w0pjf80z8l6yb9a8wmni8za3mpx85-simple-scan-3.24.1/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled > warning: arbitrarily choosing /gnu/store/7dq7vkvrykv3wm9l8j617v3xbn44g51i-epiphany-3.24.3/share/glib-2.0/schemas/gschemas.compiled > > 1. > How do we deal with these gschema collisions? I know eventually we > should solve almost all collisions we have, but gschemas seems > more important than the usual ones. For reference, here’s the discussion of the same issue by the Nix folks: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/1455 > 2. > I also think we should formalize how to deal with the collisions > or specific groups of collisions, so that we might have a better > way to tackle these issues. I don’t know what “formalize” means in this context, but I agree that we should aim to reduce the number of conflicts where possible. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net