From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: =?utf-8?Q?=E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99?= is back! Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 21:10:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87fuc8lvm5.fsf@fastmail.com> References: <878ti3uzaz.fsf@gnu.org> <20170829084453.GJ1618@macbook42.flashner.co.il> <20170830093016.GP1618@macbook42.flashner.co.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39400) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dn8O1-00063W-T9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:10:50 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dn8Ny-0006Mm-MG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Aug 2017 15:10:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170830093016.GP1618@macbook42.flashner.co.il> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Efraim Flashner , Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= Cc: guix-devel --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Efraim Flashner writes: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:44:53AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 12:01:40AM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> > Hello Guix! >> >=20 >> > Yup, I just created a new =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99 branch by pus= hing >> > . Enjoy! >> >=20 >> > Let=E2=80=99s freeze in one month, say Oct. 1st? >> >=20 >> > Ludo=E2=80=99. >> >=20 >>=20 >> Lets also have a reminder about a week before to make sure we get things >> like tzdata. >>=20 >> I'm currently test building texinfo@6.4. I tried a blind update of >> glibc, binutils, texinfo and grep but it failed during building a gcc, >> so now i'm breaking it into smaller chunks. >>=20 > > It looks like binutils@2.29.1 is coming mid-September=C2=B9 so I'm not > touching binutils for now. I'm not sure why updating glibc is causing > gcc to fail to build. Can you post the glibc update patch? Probably unrelated, but we also have to change the '--enable-kernel' configure flag to say '3.2.0' since that is the minimum supported by glibc 2.26. Also, one month, yay! Hopefully a shorter schedule will reduce the amount of build issues during each round. Since we're on the topic, I would like to switch to GCC 6 or 7 soon... Are we agile enough to use the very latest GCC by default yet? :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlmnDbIACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPp48Qf/bYS8KSwBSPUr/q4fa6I8/tfxi5lkjdBQKp1Jx3BG9cDVeIFpBF0Ysk+w nhBzD3c7ffdhCfWnJ5+gI4Fqn5Dwiy8oNmVMlOxOMVbXgF9xL2r7B71IW9iu+xzi LDEuz/oZ13ACndXD4WNL2SVi38Z1SNBbR711jF9oCNJ0fkFkRDhXfq+jk+V72RzE xKX+lcQpbUpA2Vc9+FYwL3OBSSdkI53UeXd57d1LLsp+lOa1zilxSC1GwYyePVTt EeSyyajB0Ox2zIVtoo4xqlE3Sj64VEfRVkT7jV5aIlwEUw9ezqec8Z+jPq77bG+I 7MTUf9tCCCGqxT9D6MN16mM/G4tNgQ== =zKlD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--