From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?=)
Subject: bug#28088: "The name org.a11y.Bus was not provided by any .service
	files" with multiple applications
Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2017 11:11:18 +0800
Message-ID: <87fuc4bhnt.fsf@member.fsf.org>
References: <20170814192808.5ppgwpahwe4mre5h@abyayala>
	<20170814195645.ctqil2qdcusduvy5@abyayala>
	<87h8wys83v.fsf@member.fsf.org> <8760d0u50l.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51054)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1doLKQ-0000b6-UG
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 23:12:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1doLKM-0002FX-80
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 23:12:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35750)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1doLKM-0002FQ-4I
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 23:12:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1doLKL-00027T-VJ
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 23:12:01 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28088.B28088.15044082908108@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <8760d0u50l.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\=
	\=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sun, 03 Sep 2017 00:09:30 +0200")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 28088@debbugs.gnu.org

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes:

> Hi!
>
> iyzsong@member.fsf.org (=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6) skribis:
>
>> GTK+ applications will provide accessibility support over this dbus
>> service, so the AT-SPI clients (screen reader etc.) could use them.
>>
>> And this 'org.a11y.Bus' service can be auto activated by the dbus
>> session daemon if the 'at-spi2-core' package is available.  If not,
>> we'll get thoese warnning from applications.
>
> It does sound like our GuixSD setup fails to activate org.a11y.Bus
> though.  Should we add a service in %desktop-services that extends
> =E2=80=98dbus-root-service-type=E2=80=99 with =E2=80=98at-spi2-core=E2=80=
=99 to ensure that
> auto-activation works?

It's not a dbus system service, we can extend 'profile-service-package'
with 'at-spi2-core' to make it available for the user's dbus session
daemon.

>
> I think we should strive to provide accessible environments when
>possible, as with GNOME.

Yes, but without a client (we only have 'orca') the AT-SPI service alone
is not useful, maybe we should add Orca to both GNOME and Xfce? (I'm not
a user of any, so can't be sure.)