From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Vong Subject: Re: maxima: The SGC segfault recovery test failed with memprotect_bad_fault_address, SGC disabled Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 22:15:06 +0800 Message-ID: <87fu928mxh.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87ineh9jil.fsf@gmail.com> <87wp2syd3m.fsf@posteo.net> <87375ep1s8.fsf@gmail.com> <87r2sqjjl7.fsf@posteo.net> <87mv3ejjfl.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eIbEl-0000XT-IX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 09:15:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eIbEi-0003OJ-AF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 09:15:19 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c05::231]:44401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eIbEi-0003NA-1B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 09:15:16 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id c123so16801857pga.11 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 06:15:15 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87mv3ejjfl.fsf@posteo.net> (Kei Kebreau's message of "Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:46:06 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Kei Kebreau Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 29256-done@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kei Kebreau writes: > Kei Kebreau writes: >> >> I turns out that the issue is with stratified garbage collection in >> GCL. The substitute from hydra.gnu.org does in fact give me the error >> when I run "(si::sgc-on t)" in the REPL. I'm preparing a patch to update >> GCL to the version used in Debian stable (GCL git tag "pathnames1.13") and >> we'll see if changing that definition on the master branch will do anything. > > On second thought, the patches applied to Debian Sid's GCL look useful > as well. Anyway, keep an eye out for my update patch. Thank you! The patch works, the warning has gone. I am closing this bug. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEdZDkzSn0Cycogr9IxYq4eRf1Ea4FAloZeuoACgkQxYq4eRf1 Ea5IIQ//QmFptjXnA+EebXqb+RF9QPAmCV/i+vhPqZjnjya8wYsI13En14OhO16Q xNHuQage/ziWqsvyxpCtd6KIXkn5gvxY9vGFnSXGmt2ndJ1f6kB5MdMwhawuy1E9 Ni6ymcftnul6Jx2mqlW/Hf0ZPHaV/FSvWVm0h8aSArajqLO3V1qHy379+wmtiQDn 8oTzBUuLFoxRri2VKQbVQOwYUfuOT1Uhrv/5/GftZTJ8W4bErCXJFC5SeqGkxize qoT7ie3I8+wjRbk1iicTB/EpNw6CwGLNHJOFwShUWxomTCaYf38CI7FbHaqyxknQ S8WQV4I8HxdO0W9tg9fNck46v5w6KF7P+re/QmWQXcNFd4W4UVk5JAd00GBNLUNB UDCh3p3LIHSX+pSrIwxUSjnoI8LabAvy9XenwEXWU1KhpcLzwsTNxCa4bjf1AHjR vv6sF0KHotq262zBZLg4YHLiWftuvZ+ppBUkAc2juhFTuVpy6WbZuUfcUCdMFny9 UKOAcymcrQuFiEBhY+ww6Hb/JAZpdzRtRsJw2s8eSvlq/5u/+BwuQ17g+pNT84ya OY/ilG0aOyMzKDiU4lrjErpHRdtnG4gzVfMsP/aXLK+5MKGuJPQUt5XMPYon98Hu HUWyLRWMshBsxf+8SkumJEIo/aO0La9bkfsDNsfkLvxyBTdmmOA= =5cSY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--