From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34571) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaqgD-00031L-Pj for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:23:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaqgA-0000Ds-Uv for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:23:05 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48524) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaqgA-0000Dk-S4 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:23:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eaqgA-0002y4-Mg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:23:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#28773] [PATCH] Wrap bin files in the ruby build system. Resent-Message-ID: References: <20171010084452.036b3052@cbaines.net> <877evvdycy.fsf@gnu.org> <87k1wom5j9.fsf@gnu.org> <1b7ecb41-7ba7-2fa9-2e7d-c2e6cc008314@uq.edu.au> From: Christopher Baines In-reply-to: <1b7ecb41-7ba7-2fa9-2e7d-c2e6cc008314@uq.edu.au> Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 22:22:51 +0000 Message-ID: <87fu78t70k.fsf@cbaines.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ben Woodcroft Cc: 28773@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Ben Woodcroft writes: > Hello! > > > On 12/01/18 07:47, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Ben Woodcroft skribis: >> >>> On 16/10/17 23:19, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >>>> Hi Chris, >>>> >>>> Christopher Baines skribis: >>>> >>>>> This is a bit experimental. There is some description of the motivati= on >>>>> behind this approach, as well as the downsides in the commit messages. >>>>> >>>>> I don't know how to wrap binaries with the GEM_PATH, but somehow >>>>> excluding inputs specified as native-inputs, so I'd be very interested >>>>> if anyone has ideas about this. >>>>> >>>>> Christopher Baines (3): >>>>> ruby-build-system: Add wrap-ruby-program. >>>>> ruby-build-system: Add a new wrap phase. >>>>> gnu: Remove redundant wrapping from packages using ruby-build-sys= tem. >>>> Cc=E2=80=99ing Ben who is another Serious Ruby User I think. :-) >>> Maybe sometimes. I'll try to get a review back to you in the next week >>> or so. >> Ahem. :-) >> >> Chris, if you=E2=80=99re confident, I=E2=80=99d say you can go ahead. I= t does sound >> like an improvement so it=E2=80=99d be sad to lose it. > Ah yes, my apologies. Yes, this series LGTM, and it worked fine when I=20 > applied it in local packages too. Super, thanks for taking a look Ben :) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEEPonu50WOcg2XVOCyXiijOwuE9XcFAlpb2DtfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldDNF ODlFRUU3NDU4RTcyMEQ5NzU0RTBCMjVFMjhBMzNCMEI4NEY1NzcACgkQXiijOwuE 9Xfp6w/+OfSwTeu9W2ocfFBuNanJhMq0kDiXezm4mFhb1AHAii4AD3ORlFR5Ub6t TznQMfag3764g8RjA7BIuVlpCaGWAI1lur4RxXDyoBUnCjuBYFe47ovIuSxuq8U5 f1Hkd14/aKCdZw/ZA7GFIPTs2cRES+Ygk1iBg1Vq6UXYVjCpDQ6RqCREL0y9pFRT WjHhlO/K5utPC+dfuipjrH3Y99QtcY9mTxialIXgz6q7jL2IWLZvAHDgpA0+3hTR QTbkAJ0wdIW+X6YXU0WfF+71nZ1dQh9kvnre4dJ3Vn7qUlp0kfZVGvyWimFLbO3o LulpTzwV48dbLLr482atHkL5rPf7+x98GiDqXbkHF5UilY0UdKI1gvlsQsKuavSB WdDU1GxQxdQhpmLe7nekTfBaoVxdmwrG11n/s9lp8In4Fb/07xa4phuuUynnnQsQ OyIa7y3ltWgokhySuUdMs4w+/RjO/q6HZAyXpOl5JSXJesWT+GXK1OVhg+ztDyMB HEq8K85crGD3Rkq4ctnw/yr03L231/AGMSR9sTT7hkPtmPV1FVHDm5oU2EpX7X9+ cbYAencAG6fhKT3ph0eVWnURpDy/ncRWrZAHXdclvw8kL8PQ7b6NZ3HbhAQwjm6D oHTaU/1ADGDvLhZXCfjHhDTPTk1wwyu9TsZFinOVg56x5FlSX50= =NQmc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--