Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au> writes:

> Hello!
>
>
> On 12/01/18 07:47, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au> skribis:
>>
>>> On 16/10/17 23:19, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>
>>>> Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis:
>>>>
>>>>> This is a bit experimental. There is some description of the motivation
>>>>> behind this approach, as well as the downsides in the commit messages.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know how to wrap binaries with the GEM_PATH, but somehow
>>>>> excluding inputs specified as native-inputs, so I'd be very interested
>>>>> if anyone has ideas about this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Christopher Baines (3):
>>>>>     ruby-build-system: Add wrap-ruby-program.
>>>>>     ruby-build-system: Add a new wrap phase.
>>>>>     gnu: Remove redundant wrapping from packages using ruby-build-system.
>>>> Cc’ing Ben who is another Serious Ruby User I think.  :-)
>>> Maybe sometimes. I'll try to get a review back to you in the next week
>>> or so.
>> Ahem.  :-)
>>
>> Chris, if you’re confident, I’d say you can go ahead.  It does sound
>> like an improvement so it’d be sad to lose it.
> Ah yes, my apologies. Yes, this series LGTM, and it worked fine when I 
> applied it in local packages too.

Super, thanks for taking a look Ben :)