From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45302)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eqNqj-0007x3-He
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:50:10 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eqNqg-0004GH-DC
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:50:09 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54208)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1eqNqg-0004GB-9l
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:50:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1eqNqg-0001fF-3Q
	for guix-patches@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Feb 2018 13:50:06 -0500
Subject: bug#30469: [PATCH 0/1] Require Guile >= 2.0.14
Resent-To: guix-patches@gnu.org
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.30469.D30469.15196709826331.done@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <20180215152627.4695-1-ludo@gnu.org>
	<20180224083032.4f5f1e36@centurylink.net> <87k1v280yz.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20180225151831.1b413f51@centurylink.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 19:49:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20180225151831.1b413f51@centurylink.net> (Eric Bavier's message
	of "Sun, 25 Feb 2018 18:59:24 -0600")
Message-ID: <87fu5ntwl9.fsf@gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
	<mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Eric Bavier <ericbavier@centurylink.net>
Cc: 30469-done@debbugs.gnu.org

Eric Bavier <ericbavier@centurylink.net> skribis:

> On Sat, 24 Feb 2018 23:41:24 +0100
> ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>=20
>> Eric Bavier <ericbavier@centurylink.net> skribis:
>>=20
>> > On Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:26:27 +0100
>> > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>> >=20=20
>> >> Hello Guix,
>> >>=20
>> >> This patch is to require Guile >=3D 2.0.14, released one year ago, in=
stead
>> >> of 2.0.9, released in 2013.
>> >>=20
>> >> For the record, here=E2=80=99s the distro status:
>> >>=20
>> >>   =E2=80=A2 Debian unstable has 2.2:
>> >>     <https://packages.debian.org/search?suite=3Ddefault&section=3Dall=
&arch=3Dany&searchon=3Dnames&keywords=3Dguile-2.2>.
>> >>=20
>> >>   =E2=80=A2 Older Debian versions have 2.0.13 (not .14):
>> >>     <https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=3Dguile-2.0>.=20=20
>> >
>> > How much of this patch would change if it were to instead support
>> > 2.0.13?  Is cutting off users of Debian stable a good idea?=20=20
>>=20
>> I=E2=80=99ll double-check but I think the patch remains valid if we requ=
ire
>> 2.0.13.
>>=20
>> If it works I=E2=80=99ll commit that next week.
>
> Cool.

Pushed as 1d84d7bf6052c0c80bd212d4524876576e9817d4.

Thanks for your feedback!

Ludo=E2=80=99.