From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Neidhardt <ambrevar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: inxi and inxi-full
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2018 22:49:09 +0530
Message-ID: <87fu40pcky.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87h8p0wb6m.fsf@gmail.com> <87woxwkypg.fsf@gmail.com>
	<874ll09kn6.fsf@gmail.com> <87po353efj.fsf@gmail.com>
	<877epcesqb.fsf@gmail.com> <877epcq0mg.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87h8og1hgi.fsf_-_@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33376)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ambrevar@gmail.com>) id 1f6fsT-0007F9-Py
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 13:19:19 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ambrevar@gmail.com>) id 1f6fsP-0001sH-NK
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 13:19:17 -0400
Received: from mail-pl0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::230]:37282)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ambrevar@gmail.com>) id 1f6fsP-0001rx-Gn
	for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 13:19:13 -0400
Received: by mail-pl0-x230.google.com with SMTP id v5-v6so4355564plo.4
	for <help-guix@gnu.org>; Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:19:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-reply-to: <87h8og1hgi.fsf_-_@gmail.com>
List-Id: <help-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:help-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-guix>,
	<mailto:help-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Help-Guix" <help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust@gmail.com>
Cc: help-guix <help-guix@gnu.org>

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Oleg Pykhalov <go.wigust@gmail.com> writes:

> Pierre Neidhardt <ambrevar@gmail.com> writes:
>
> What do you think about =E2=80=98inxi=E2=80=99 package with inputs, which=
 are only
> required to run it,
> and another =E2=80=98inxi-full=E2=80=99 package, which will inherit =E2=
=80=98inxi=E2=80=99, but with
> additional inputs?

My first thought is that it sounds like a good alternative to the
concept of optional dependencies.

I like the idea.

It also means that the `inxi` package cannot patch inxi with full store
paths.

Any suggestion other than making leaving ENV{'PATH'} untouched and
setting @paths to it?

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt

There is more to life than increasing its speed.
		-- Mahatma Gandhi

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAlrPlQ0ACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH9Lsgf+ItAR7neZJZGj8f2G9WYGRc1WwlvSHloxy5BhEqOAumarGRhTxile7Enc
iBf96nvYHouuIC6jHYFqs+0nX6ihEZa1kNkRBQXoCb1q/A+IYxqlXGOioTob5daz
tQ8Owyz3J0NBsP9QMaX+5ZNsWWqriQaPisDtF7vHlm9CKnshMMHfony7ZKoDBIvA
+zb0o/64Oi7h5I2+IiZkfhYH5LukxFNWg0TAwtvMp0uDOxuvOkzfRXb9rQcgfFZo
tkqJ0dDdc2yFA4UbtfU/1MoO3bXo+SwMasivp2FaTkJ1d3qjMeNVNTuOle8REWWX
tzYB+DM6+jr9s5TpWCBKhbyf1p8ACg==
=uDAa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--