From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: Update of Emacs to 26.1. Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 19:35:16 +0300 Message-ID: <87fu2a8lob.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87wovnr399.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <87k1rmbyb5.fsf@gmail.com> <87sh6ar932.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46340) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNhak-0001Pv-W8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 12:35:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNhaf-0007uc-Ni for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 12:35:22 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]:36329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fNhaf-0007uO-G1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 May 2018 12:35:17 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id v131-v6so23151745wma.1 for ; Tue, 29 May 2018 09:35:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87sh6ar932.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue, 29 May 2018 13:32:45 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Ricardo Wurmus (2018-05-29 13:32 +0200) wrote: > Alex Kost writes: > >> Ricardo Wurmus (2018-05-28 21:25 +0200) wrote: >> >> [...] >>> The update did break =E2=80=9Cemacs-minimal=E2=80=9D and thus all Emacs= packages, but >>> that can be fixed by passing =E2=80=9C--with-gnutls=3Dno=E2=80=9D to em= acs-minimal: >> >> I like it! I think '*-minimal' packages should be as minimal as possibl= e. > > =E2=80=9Cemacs-minimal=E2=80=9D already didn=E2=80=99t have gnutls among = its inputs, but the > build system now complains about this unless the configure flags make > that explicit to show intent. Oops, sorry, I didn't pay the required attention to the problem you solved when I wrote that :-) I just thought that 'emacs-minimal' had unneeded 'gnutls' input and you removed it. But now I see, thanks! --=20 Alex