From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Cuirass changes
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 19:19:47 +0200
Message-ID: <87fu0pitak.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87h8lh34av.fsf@lassieur.org> <874lh6nkwd.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87wou1vn3i.fsf@lassieur.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52208)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1fdImM-0005tv-C6
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:19:51 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1fdImL-0000y7-Df
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:19:50 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87wou1vn3i.fsf@lassieur.org> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Cl=C3=A9ment?=
	Lassieur"'s message of "Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:55:13 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?utf-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur <clement@lassieur.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur <clement@lassieur.org> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>>> 1. Adding support for multiple inputs.  Currently Cuirass only supports
>>> one input per specification, which has to be the Guix git repository.
>>> But one might want inputs for:
>>>   - a repository containing the 'proc' that returns the jobs,
>>>   - a repository containing extra packages (GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH).
>>> Those inputs would be fetched at INTERVAL as well, and any change would
>>> trigger an evaluation.  This is a follow-up of
>>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches/2018-06/msg00311.html.
>>
>> Excellent.  I think the polling interval should be per input, while
>> we=E2=80=99re at it.
>
> Indeed, but that would complicate things.  Would it make sense to do it
> in another commit?

Sure, this can definitely be done later, I was just mentioning it in
passing.

Ludo=E2=80=99.