From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment?= Lassieur Subject: bug#32955: Cuirass: Some tests depend on 'guix-current', which makes them resource expensive Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 15:44:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87ftxgk0x2.fsf@lassieur.org> References: <87murr5foj.fsf@lassieur.org> <87ftxgzi1x.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46077) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g9W5j-00017T-HK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 10:01:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g9VrH-00053d-0j for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 09:46:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35760) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1g9VrG-00053T-T7 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 09:46:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g9VrG-0001FD-Ho for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Oct 2018 09:46:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-reply-to: <87ftxgzi1x.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 32955@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: > Hello, > > Cl=C3=A9ment Lassieur skribis: > >> Tests depending on 'guix-current' are expensive in terms of CPU and >> storage usage since we need to build (current-guix) and then store a >> couple of full system images. > > [...] > >> Is there another way to get those tests to work without depending on >> 'guix-current'? > > These tests are indeed expensive. However the motivation here is > precisely to test a complete installation procedure using the current > Guix in the installation image. If we were to change that we=E2=80=99d be > testing something different and much less interesting. > > So I think there=E2=80=99s not much we can do here. > > Does that make sense? Yes it does :-) Thank you for the reply! > (Note that all the other system tests use just whatever snapshot the > =E2=80=98guix=E2=80=99 package refers to, which is good enough for them b= ecause they > don=E2=80=99t test things where Guix itself is involved.) > > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99.