From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gELV9-0007bg-AK for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:43:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gELLJ-0000FU-98 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:33:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58724) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gELLJ-0000FL-2n for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:33:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gELLI-0007Fe-VN for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Oct 2018 17:33:00 -0400 Subject: [bug#33038] [PATCH 3/6] bootstrap: Add %bootstrap-mes. Resent-Message-ID: From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen References: <20181014085857.3863-1-janneke@gnu.org> <20181014085857.3863-3-janneke@gnu.org> <87r2gld3nt.fsf@gnu.org> <875zxxax4f.fsf@gnu.org> <87sh0z6m83.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 23:32:41 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87sh0z6m83.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Sun, 21 Oct 2018 23:09:16 +0200") Message-ID: <87ftwz9e9y.fsf@gnu.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 33038@debbugs.gnu.org Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: >> + (begin >> + (use-modules (guix build utils) >> + (ice-9 popen)) > > Exactly. Ok, good! >> I copied this from %bootstrap-gcc, do we want to to change this in all >> bootstrap packages too? > > Yes, we should do that while we=E2=80=99re at it. I'll add a commit for all other packages, need to do a rebuild anyway :-) >> (attached, and also on my gitlab core-updates-next. Now for a >> rebuild... > > Heh. :-) > > Well there=E2=80=99s the option of merging core-updates as Marius suggest= ed, > though that will mean yet another (partial) rebuild, so you=E2=80=99d hav= e to be > patient. WDYT? Yes, just did that -- happy with Marius' info and suggestion. >> From 04c237218d10756582e6dce5763eaca9704d13cf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen >> Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2018 09:02:39 +0200 >> Subject: [PATCH 3/3] bootstrap: Add %bootstrap-mes. >>=20 >> This include bootstrap seeds >>=20 >> mes-stripped-0.18-0.08f04f5-x86_64-linux.tar.xz >> 14sbcm79ml4rgygxvx1135827g3ggfx1c1vchk77z26yibbdw9nh >>=20 >> mes-stripped-0.18-0.08f04f5-i686-linux.tar.xz >> 1p116ya9n52852bryh34n7db4mhvi98qifmmwygl7nbyc4dz92jy > > I think this info is not necessary here since those hashes appear in the > file. Ok. >> built with the previous commit >>=20 >> dea5dfa03 bootstrap: FTBFS hack for icu4c, python-more-itertools, sw= ig. > > In the final commit please write the full rather than the abbreviated > commit hash. Ok. > Anyway LGTM modulo maybe one rebuild and commit log tweak. Great, once everything builds I'll update core-updates-next on savannah, ping this bug and close it. Otherwise...oh well. Thanks! janneke