From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38657) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h89Ri-0003Vi-M6 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 16:10:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h89Ji-000825-BR for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 16:02:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43550) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h89Ji-000821-81 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 16:02:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h89Ji-0002DY-49 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2019 16:02:02 -0400 Subject: [bug#34865] [PATCH] Add emacs-zones. Resent-Message-ID: From: Oleg Pykhalov References: <87o96bulym.fsf@gmail.com> <87y3561tgq.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 23:01:34 +0300 In-Reply-To: <87y3561tgq.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Fri, 22 Mar 2019 22:37:25 +0100") Message-ID: <87ftrct529.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Brian Leung , 34865@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s writes: [=E2=80=A6] >> Could we use emacs-zones from Elpa? See >> https://elpa.gnu.org/packages/zones.html . =E2=80=98guix import elpa >> emacs-zones=E2=80=99 will produce a decent =E2=80=98origin=E2=80=99 reco= rd to pull a source. > > My understanding is that ELPA and MELPA tarballs are not necessarily > persistent and immutable, and that we generally prefer referring > directly to the upstream repo. Ouch, I thought ELPA is persistent. That's a significant argument to not use ELPA for our purposes :-( . > Or am I confusing things? We preferred ELPA over GitHub's Git repositories in emacs-xys.scm (emacs.scm in past), didn't we? Oleg. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEcjhxI46s62NFSFhXFn+OpQAa+pwFAlyX4h4ACgkQFn+OpQAa +pw2VRAAj2me2WRUj54sh1u+frVm7XS5/+qTRImJC/dkVRDa6UJnApnjH89Tb0yV zJuejabIMrwre5Q4NpcTif7hxCEvck23Tr9rGgIuhn5aIWxmr9K/nAo+FU6O4zc6 pfqTFkzUd5ZnkYBJREElvFVytRjErVpn25EWOC18j7AdSDEVCttcr0q3eyMdb8lC cxwJaN1yD7K1rmppD+oZQZ6yZlaiuM3ZQZpCQ06Aty5x23OejBP2in12Eg6mdeTV HJQ+fIhsgVjCl4iK7QPcyMGZfDVGF4PMX+s5BZ8JBacyvuyXIAelA1YFDXTfOEtc vZP11Rkuezu4/VZ9gitb8ikdLmWQiZohlnlz7wPcIvOql0W1sjhpL51YuquQqCvF rFZS1HUvFYe4Ly+TFq42bJZgR3ClzHeX/nErO7CuJ58/eNnh1xigjEAQXSOzylcZ STDawKJYTqCmzfVXl+BU/RWz4sqk4K1pOociEewXD8tbLOpBYReezIEe3iqaGAhj sKjRX88oxdhcHTHLsYVExBdrdchbgV5ANpzW+op1ZfM4TPCrCY4le8ujRqUeniZf XYi1hDqUatA3Eod8tm/4Mevi++JoStsjefYB9KcxdZF+RV0nsPCG4no5VkNssVWD Ql9AZxZ+1NwV9UgznjJNfR+oTc2o86PYMZhk5TvrkpwnWT68QGE= =dPy5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--