* Should our openssl/fixed not have more fixin's by now?
[not found] ` <20190911164845.C8B65207F5@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
@ 2019-09-11 17:05 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice @ 2019-09-11 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 628 bytes --]
Guix,
1 CVE patch since 1.0.2p seems suspiciously low to me. I hope I'm
wrong. In any case, there are new ones[0].
Me on IRC:
“I'd like to fix some CVEs in openssl, but it's not clear to me
whether ‘letter releases’ are supposed to be ABI-compatible or
not. It would be a big jump (1.0.2p → 1.0.2t), and our current
openssl/fixed is just 1.0.2p + 1 patch, so I doubt it. But
cherry-picking patches is proving too painful [for me].”
…mainly because I'm not that familiar with OpenSSLs release/git
habits.
Kind regards,
T G-R
[0]: https://www.openssl.org/news/cl102.txt
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 227 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2019-09-11 17:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20190911164844.9037.97931@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <20190911164845.C8B65207F5@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
2019-09-11 17:05 ` Should our openssl/fixed not have more fixin's by now? Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.