From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Subject: Re: 23/33: gnu: commencement: gcc-boot0: Build fix for the Hurd. Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:53:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87fteg2u56.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200310075832.7126.86402@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200310075850.035F02125B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87imjcwp1a.fsf@gnu.org> <20200310091810.GT1423@E5400> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33379) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBfKM-0003si-QA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 09:53:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20200310091810.GT1423@E5400> (Efraim Flashner's message of "Tue, 10 Mar 2020 11:18:10 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Efraim Flashner writes: > On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:13:37AM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> guix-commits@gnu.org skribis: >>=20 >> > commit 7a57ca758c590742b63100944f07fddb7290f797 >> > Author: Jan Nieuwenhuizen >> > AuthorDate: Sun Mar 1 13:45:42 2020 +0100 >> > >> > gnu: commencement: gcc-boot0: Build fix for the Hurd. >> >=20=20=20=20=20 >> > Fixes: >> > g++ -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exce= ptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwri= te-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -ped= antic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -DHAVE_= CONFIG_H -DGENERATOR_FILE -fno-PIE -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc -Wl,-rp= ath=3D/gnu/store/vp2id82a597p119b3wyhhkhd467wvn78-glibc-bootstrap-0/lib -Wl= ,-dynamic-linker -Wl,/gnu/store/vp2id82a597p119b3w [...] >> > build/genmddeps.o build/read-md.o build/errors.o ../build-= i586-unknown-gnu/libiberty/libiberty.a >> > /gnu/store/jk3kx5jwjs9m60svzk6sz79bf0w33l91-binutils-cross-boo= t0-2.34/bin/ld: build/read-md.o: in function `md_reader::~md_reader()': >> > /tmp/guix-build-gcc-cross-boot0-7.5.0.drv-0/build/gcc/../../gc= c-7.5.0/gcc/read-md.c:1049: undefined reference to `operator delete(void*, = unsigned int)' >> >=20=20=20=20=20 >> > This raises the question: Should libstdc++-boot0 (v4.9) be suffici= ent to build >> > gcc-boot0 (v7.5.0)? >>=20 >> Hmm? :-) >>=20 >> > * gnu/packages/commencement.scm (gcc-boot0): Add static library pa= th. >>=20 >> > `(,(string-append "LDFLAGS=3D" >> > + (if ,(hurd-system?) >> > + (string-append >> > + "-L" (assoc-ref %build-inputs "= gcc") "/lib ") >> > + "") >>=20 >> Could you add a comment saying that this is to allow the =E2=80=98delete= =E2=80=99 >> operator to be found? Weird. >>=20 >> That=E2=80=99s it, thanks for the great work! ... I agree, however trying without this and Efraim's patch instead first. > With the bootstrapping efforts going around there's a couple of patches > floating around to change the gcc version for libstdc++-boot0. I've > tested the following patch, which also prepares the way for any other > future supported platforms. That looks nice; thanks -- I have added i586-gnu and am trying if that works for me. janneke --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com