From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44886)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jE71C-0006kU-Pv
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 03:52:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jE71B-0006jj-My
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 03:52:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60410)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jE71B-0006j8-JM
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 03:52:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jE718-00045W-Hz
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 03:52:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#38546] [PATCH v5] Julia: Update to 1.3.1
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.38546.B38546.158443148415654@debbugs.gnu.org>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Nicol=C3=B2?= Balzarotti <anothersms@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200316100641.GK927@E5400>
References: <CAJ3okZ1SaicNCyXmreOWsByyirkuPD3JSvmAR_Vza=OiKTeRmw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJ3okZ3oNSa0zkkSxUJ75rX5UKGByYTf9zR4zn5Cd6W6=9qJpQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <87imjvwvjx.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
 <CAJ3okZ0Zczy6mO9UgpCaO2SedxUm-bSZ_jwcP9O1_b4F7uOoqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <87fteywndk.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
 <87blplwmuk.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
 <20200316100641.GK927@E5400>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 08:51:13 +0100
Message-ID: <87fte7772m.fsf@guixSD.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: 38546@debbugs.gnu.org, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>

Hi Efraim, thanks for the report.

Yes, according to this report[1] we should downgrade libgit2 0.99.  I'll
try to send an updated patch in the next days.

In the meanwhile, reding arch bug-tracker [2] I saw that libgit2 depends
on http-parser (USE_HTTP_PARSER).  Should we unbundle it from git?

Thanks, Nicol=C3=B2

[1] https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/33111
[2] https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/65540



Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

> The upgrade of libgit2 to 0.99.0 seems to have broken this
>
> julia bin/install_packages.jl
> Activating environment at `~/workspace/LMGPU.jl/Project.toml`
>    Cloning default registries into `~/.julia`
>    Cloning registry from "https://github.com/JuliaRegistries/General.git"
> ERROR: LoadError: failed to clone from https://github.com/JuliaRegistries=
/General.git, error: GitError(Code:ERROR, Class:Invalid, invalid version 0 =
on git_proxy_options)
>
> Other bug reports from other libgit2 version bumps suggest using an
> older version of libgit2
>
>
> --=20
> Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=
=9D =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8
> GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
> Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypt=
ed